Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Pound was a persistent letter writer no matter where he was. From Wabash College in Indiana to the Disciplinary Training Center in Pisa or St. Elizabeths Hospital in Washington, he wrote to defend, cajole, instruct, and inspire. He wrote to writers, students, senators, publishers, newspapers, critics, friends, and enemies. His letters were guides, manifestoes, reports, and political statements. They agitated, praised, complained, and celebrated cultural follies, historical achievements, and individual works. They were never dull. Disciples and presidents, girlfriends and professors were his recipients. His first publication was a letter in the form of a poem to the Jenkintown, PA Times Chronicle in 1902. Nearly his last were letters written almost up to his death to William Cookson, editor of Agenda . Many letters were literary in their focus. To Harriet Monroe, editor of Poetry , for example, he would often complain, criticize, and occasionally compliment her selections, while also demanding that she print new poets like Frost and Eliot. To William Carlos Williams, he praised his work, but urged him to get out of New Jersey and over to Europe. To Margaret Cravens, he wrote personal letters expressing his appreciation of her support. But his letters also became a platform for his more controversial and extreme views. Though ignoring the often objectionable gradations of ideologies and beliefs held by Pound in the late 1920s and beyond is no longer tenable for critics and/or readers, it would be easier (though not defensible) to rationalize them or minimize their potency were one to be concerned only with the poetry or even only with the poetry and criticism. Attempts to defend or ignore Pound’s transgressions become absurd in the face of certain of his letters, especially given the fact that in many of them he offers opinions and views that are more clearly expressed and more raw and frank, even if they are not different in import, from the same opinions as these are depicted in his essays and poetry.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,347 | 0,260 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».