Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In 2015, the Federation of Canadian Demographers (FCD) held a conference in Ottawa on the theme "Revisiting Demographic Challenges in the 21st Century-Population Dynamics, Demographic Methods, and Public Policy."The organizers' intention was to revisit some of the dominant ideas expressed at an earlier FCD conference, "Demographic Challenges of the 21st Century."Indeed, important social demographic changes evolved over the 10-year span between these two conferences: Canadian society witnessed the continuing urbanization of Canada's Indigenous Peoples; fertility rates stayed low, at sub-replacement levels; family structures became increasing more complex; continued ageing of the population led to an increasingly older labour force, as well as changes in health policies; changes in immigration patterns has resulted in the social fabric becoming increasingly diverse along ethnic, racial, religious, and linguistic lines; and cancellation of the long-form census in 2011 (recently reinstated for the 2016 Census) prompted researchers to explore new data sources in order to supplement available census data.It was noted in the call for papers for the FCD 2015 Conference that although some of the challenges raised during the 2005 conference had been addressed, new challenges had since presented themselves, and a substantial number of challenges still remained to be explored.Consequently, the FCD's Scientific Committee 1 prepared a program that reflected the demographic challenges that we faced in the 2015, and offered an excellent platform to expand demographic research in Canada.It was agreed early in the planning process for the 2015 FCD conference that a selection of the papers would be published in two journal special issues-Canadian Studies in Population for the presentations given in English and Cahiers québécois de démographie for the presentations given in French.The six papers presented in this issue of CSP offer an excellent cross-section of the research presented at the conference.The themes addressed encompass the retention of immigrants across Canada; the relationship between sociodemographic factors, self-rated health and mortality; immigrant employment and earnings; measures of obesity among Canadian Indigenous and non-Indigenous children, youth, and young adults; non-residential fatherhood; and gender inequality in the family setting.In the leading paper, Beaujot and colleagues offer an important analysis and discussion of the respective gender roles and responsibilities within a family unit.2 They observe that although gender inequalities with respect to paid and unpaid work have diminished, the presence of young children still results in observable inequalities.They recognize the impact of lone parenthood on the children, and suggest that current policy must adapt to help these children to overcome the inherent disadvantages that they face due to the family structure.They propose that discussions on social policy should take into consideration the modernization of families and the concept of co-parenting.This discussion is taken a step further in Strohschein's article on non-residential fatherhood in Canada.Strohschein analyzed the 2012 Canadian Longitudinal and International Survey of Adults (LISA) to examine
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,036 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,008 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,095 | 0,039 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».