MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4246444189 · doi:10.5325/libraries.5.1.0135

A Companion to the History of the Book

2021· article· en· W4246444189 sur OpenAlex
Eileen M. Bentsen

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueLibraries Culture History and Society · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTypographyScholarshipHistoriographyPublishingPoliticsSubject (documents)Section (typography)HistoryPrint cultureHistory of the bookArt historyLibrary scienceLiteratureClassicsArtVisual artsComputer scienceLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Search WorldCat for the subject “Book history” and prior to 1980 the majority of titles are works on printers, printing, and typography, histories of collectors or libraries, or the bibliographical analysis of an author or text. The first edition of A Companion to the History of the Book provided a useful guide to the emergence of book historiography as a scholarly discipline with interests in economic, social, intellectual, and political aspects of books following the 1980 publication of Elizabeth Eisenstein's The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. The second edition updates and expands on advances and changes in the discipline, especially considering digital technology.Editors Simon Eliot and Johnathan Rose have added sixteen new essays to the original forty, reorganized the contents, and produced a two-volume work. The new essays cover aspects of the book not included in the earlier edition (paper, paleography, archives, typography, printing, and bookbinding); expand the geographic coverage to include Africa, the Slavic countries, and Canada and Australasia; and cover publishing in the sciences, cartography, and music. The final section adds essays on writers, authorship as a profession, lexicography, and book collecting. Simon and Rose have assembled leading scholars to write each chapter. Each essay provides an overview of the field, introduces readers to the essential scholarship, and suggests future research opportunities. They are consistently well written and accessible, making them suitable for academic and general readers alike.Several of the chapters have been totally rewritten by new authors. It is in these essays that the shift in focus for the history of the book during the thirteen intervening years can be seen most clearly. Dirk Van Hulle's “Textual Scholarship” discusses how the digital text brought about a shift in the goal of textual scholarship, from the desire to establish the definitive text using various methods, to creating a version of the text which takes into account the multiplicity of documents underlying a given text and the process by which a text is created (24-27). The shift brought about by digital technologies (what Van Hulle, citing Jerome McGann, calls the “digital turn,” or “digital condition”) is echoed in “The New Textual Technologies” by Elena Pierazzo and Peter Stokes.1 Here the discussion centers on the ways in which “[n]ew technologies produce new forms of textuality and refashion older ones.” (677). The authors discuss hypertexts, markup languages, and FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) in relation to their role in understanding their influence on book history. The possibility that the book is on the “edge” of transformation into “a more fluid and dynamic concept of e-textuality” (687) echoes the shift described by Van Hulle in textual scholarship.Changes that have occurred in the 13 years between editions are reflected in the final essay, “Does the Book Have a Future?” Technology lauded as new has now passed (CD-ROMS as a promising form of publishing); trends identified as interesting, such as self-publishing and ebook and cell phones as digital readers, are part of everyday life. While it is possible to question the data supporting the claim that publication of new titles is still growing,2 it is, perhaps, the function of the final essay to proclaim that the book is not dead.The second edition of A Companion to the History of the Book occupies a unique place among available titles on the history of the book. It is more than textbook, less than a history; it does not present a neat chronology of its topic, nor is it limited to a single national perspective. For a more narrative and condensed approach, look to The Cambridge Companion to the History of the Book (ed. Leslie Howsam, 2015) which presents many of the same themes – book cultures, book materials, and methods and approaches to studying the history of the book – in a manner more useful as a class text (providing a chronology and a glossary useful to those coming to the history of the book for the first time). A slightly more comprehensive introductory text is An Introduction to Book History by David Finkelstein and Alistair McCleery (Routledge, 2013), which addresses authorship more directly and fully than the Cambridge Companion.The strengths of A Companion to the History of the Book include its greater depth of coverage both in number of topics and in the deeper coverage each chapter provides, and its more current overview of scholarship and scholarly trends. Use the Howsam or Finkelstein and McCleery texts as introductions for the general public, undergraduates, and graduate students, then refer them to specific essays in A Companion to the History of the Book to continue their growth and deepen their interests. Librarians and scholars will value this book for its near-comprehensive overview of a large and developing field of academic study. This edition should not replace the first edition but should be offered alongside it – its “Introduction” provides a good summary of both editions, and the entire text has its own place in the development of book history.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,497
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,176
Écart entre enseignants0,139 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle