MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4246587232 · doi:10.4161/cbt.4.7.1973

Velcade Prolongs Survival in Relapsed Myeloma

2005· article· en· W4246587232 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueCancer Biology & Therapy · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineDexamethasoneMultiple myelomaBortezomibClinical trialInternal medicineProgressive diseaseOncologySurgeryDisease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

AbstractJune 17, 2005Trial results support earlier use of new myeloma drugResearchers say Velcade warrants testing as first-line therapyFinal results of a large Phase III trial in relapsed multiple myeloma patients show that bortezomib, or Velcade, clearly outperformed a standard drug therapy for patients with relapsed myeloma and now warrants further testing as initial therapy for the blood disease, say researchers from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.The largest trial of its kind, the APEX study compared Velcade against high-dose dexamethasone in 669 patients who had been previously treated with other drugs but had relapsed.An article in the June 16 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine reports that Velcade caused a partial or total response in 38 percent of patients, compared with 18 percent for dexamethasone. The Velcade patients went an average of 6.2 months before the disease progressed again; the time to progression was 3.5 months in patients taking dexamethasone. Four out of five, or 80 percent, of Velcade patients were alive one year later, a significant improvement over the 66 percent of patients on high dose dexamethasone."This drug has shown itself to be superior to high-dose dexamethasone in time-to-progression, response rate and survival, with a side-effect profile that is manageable," said Paul Richardson, MD, of Dana-Farber, who led the multicenter trial. "These results provide confirmation that bortezomib should be used at first relapse, and they provide a strong rationale for its use as an upfront therapy."This year, nearly 16,000 new cases of multiple myeloma will be diagnosed in the United States and 11,300 people likely will die from the disease. In multiple myeloma, cancerous plasma cells form abnormal proteins and damage the bone marrow, bone, and other vital organs. Standard treatment with combination chemotherapy and stem-cell transplants achieves responses, but myeloma remains incurable.The use of both drugs in the study was associated with serious adverse events, and nearly one-third of patients discontinued one or the other drug because of side effects. Richardson, who is also an assistant professor at Harvard Medical School, said that bortezomib has an importantly different side effect profile compared to high-dose dexamethasone. The researchers have developed strategies to reduce the drug's adverse effects, such as peripheral neuropathy, but , he adds that bortezomib-treated patients do not experience some of the very challenging problems associated with high dose dexamethasone, including glucose intolerance, weight gain and mood swings.Bortezomib is the first of a new type of cancer drug designed to attack cancer cells by blocking the proteasome, a mechanism by which cells eliminate abnormal proteins. The drug, sold as Velcade by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of Cambridge, Mass., was extensively studied preclinically for the treatment of myeloma by Teru Hideshima MD PhD, and other investigators at Dana-Farber's Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, under the directorship of Kenneth Anderson MD. Richardson and Anderson then helped design and lead the first pivotal Phase II clinical trial completed in 2001, as well as this subsequent confirmatory study.Millennium won initial accelerated Food and Drug Administration approval of Velcade for relapsed and refractory myeloma in 2003, well before this Phase III trial was completed in 2004. In March of this year, the FDA granted full approval of Velcade for myeloma patients who have received at least one prior therapy.Richardson is first author of the NEJM report and Anderson is senior author. Other authors are from medical centers in the United States, Canada, Israel and Europe, and from Millennium Pharmaceuticals.The study was supported in part by funding from Millennium Pharmaceuticals.Dana-Farber Cancer Institute is a principal teaching affiliate of the Harvard Medical School and is among the leading cancer research and care centers in the United States. It is a founding member of the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (DF/HCC), designated a comprehensive cancer center by the National Cancer Institute.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,375
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,669

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,049
Tête enseignante GPT0,372
Écart entre enseignants0,323 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCancer Biology & TherapyMême sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207