MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4247235055 · doi:10.1353/wsq.2017.0011

Overseas

2017· article· en· W4247235055 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
V. V. Ganeshananthan

Notice bibliographique

RevueWomen's studies quarterly · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBrotherWifeSalaryServantLawHistorySociologyPolitical scienceEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Overseas V. V. Ganeshananthan (bio) She had planned to go herself, or rather: they had planned to go together. Now when people ask her where her brother has gone, she says only: overseas. Pressed further about the departure, its date and cause, she ignores the question, looking out windows, into her glass of water or her teacup with its sugar sediment, at the children playing nearby, at her brother's left-behind wife artfully dismembering a single skinny fish for dinner. How much did it cost, some neighbors want to know, and: where has her brother gone? When will he return? Consider, she wishes she could say, the traveller I might have been myself. She had thought for a long time about how she might use her own holidays, where she might go on a trip to another country, but those were plans she made in the days when her education was still ahead of her, not yet forfeited, when she thought of university, when she thought of a glorious week in Kuala Lumpur, saved for on a civil servant's salary she has never made, planned for with the aid of a husband she has never had. In an hour her plate will be full of rice and fried fish and she will extract the bones from each mouthful. There is no point now in telling anyone what she knows of overseas, where it is, how much it costs, the exact hour at which her brother had left. Why would she tell them where her brother has gone, when the point is not where her brother has gone, but that she too had wanted to go? As little children—littler children, their mother would say—they longed to see the rubber plantations, where, some generations ago, they knew, other Tamils had gone. They talked about the cave temples, eating [End Page 128] chili crabs, shopping in new malls. But her brother has gone overseas without her, and here is the truth, here is why she does not answer: she does not know where her brother is. Is that face, a face made like her own face, in Ipoh now? Or Melbourne? Or Bali? Canada? Did he take a ship, or a plane? If the travelers went by boat—and thinking about it now, she is sure, it must have been a boat—how big a boat might it have been, and how many others would have been beside her brother, in the place where she should have stood, wobbling? After I go I won't contact you, he said, and: after I go I won't be able to send any money for some time. And she asked a few questions, until he gave her to understand, by the uninformative and short answers he provided, that they could no longer share any real information, because one of the prices he had agreed to pay was total silence. They were told it was for their own security, and the worst of it was that that might not have been entirely untrue. If you don't know where I am, Canada or Malaysia or Australia, you won't be able to tell anyone, he said. How will we know that you're safe, that you haven't just drowned, she asked, and this was a question he answered straight out: You won't know. For how long? I don't know. And we still pay, she said slowly, hating herself for bringing up the money. We still pay, he said. By pay, she later came to understand, they meant not any fixed number, but an amount that changed at the whims of the agents who had arranged for him to go. One month ago, she was told: your brother has used the false papers we provided to reach a place where he will be safe for one week, and for him to reach the next safe place you should pay just one lakh more. I don't have one lakh, she said, hating herself for not having any money, and the agents said: You can owe us. She is resolved. She is certain. She plucks a fish bone from between her...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,478
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,000

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0040,002
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,4780,249

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,042
Tête enseignante GPT0,357
Écart entre enseignants0,316 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueWomen's studies quarterlyMême sujetIsland Studies and Pacific AffairsTravaux en français237 207