MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4247477649 · doi:10.1353/sais.2007.0026

Foreword

2007· article· fr· W4247477649 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kristin Carlucci, Saul Garlick, Beth Hanley

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œSAIS review of international affairs · 2007
Typearticle
Languefr
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueLand Rights and Reforms
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCommon ownershipPanacea (medicine)State ownershipLaw and economicsRealmCorporate governancePrivate propertyDemocracyBusinessPolitical economyLawMarket economyEconomicsPolitical sciencePoliticsChinaFinance

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Foreword Kristin Carlucci, Saul Garlick, and Beth Hanley Lawrence Summers famously quipped, "No one in the history of the world has ever washed a rented car…why is that? It's because they didn't own it. Somebody else did."1 Ownership Matters. Ownership, specifically in the pursuit of property, has been a pillar of Western democracy since the 17th century. Yet ownership does not only matter in regards to physical property. Ownership matters in regards to states, ideas, businesses, people, processes, and natural resources. Ownership, framed with good governance and legal institutions, is power. In the Summer-Fall 2007 issue of The SAIS Review, we address why we believe ownership matters—ownership beyond the scope of property, into the realm of territory, people, resources, and institutions. Our intention is not to water down the ownership debate within the development community, rather to highlight the range and complexities of such a powerful concept in all areas of international affairs. This issue's authors discuss whether ownership of natural resources is a human right, whether ownership of private enterprises is an essential ingredient of economic growth, whether foreign ownership of domestic entities is a security risk, and if too much ownership is a dangerous thing. The first section of this issue examines the process of privatization—the transfer of ownership from the state to individuals. This section's authors argue that privatization is not a panacea for emerging economies, but it can be a powerful engine for growth if supported by the right institutions. John Nellis gives an introduction to the privatization process, discussing the challenge of rapid ownership transfers and the importance of regulatory institutions and economic incentives for all stakeholders. Three authors from the Center for International Private Enterprise consider the role of legally enforced property rights in transitioning economies, providing examples from their work in Kenya, Montenegro, and Russia. Andrew Barnes looks at the intense struggle for ownership in Russia, where a wave of privatization has been followed by continued government interference in the private sector. In the second section, the focus turns to territorial ownership. Norma Kriger highlights the case of Zimbabwe, where the transfer of land ownership without the support of a legal framework has created a national crisis. Land ownership is also critical to peace and development in the Philippines, as Astrid Tuminez describes in her article on Mindanao. Finally, Boaz Atzili questions whether fixed territorial ownership always makes a state stronger. The section on resources and institutions begins with a discussion of sovereignty and democracy. Edward Joseph finds that an 'ownership doctrine' that compels outsiders to put development processes in local hands can sometimes put states at risk. Matthew Mingus examines the [End Page 1] 2006 national elections in Canada and asks whether the political scandals that shaped the election were driven by a shift from traditional democratic, public-sector values to market-based, private sector values. Sarah Hale looks at the importance of rights not in reference to property, but to resources, as she discusses the precarious legal position of urban water users in the Philippines. Leif-Eric Easley develops the concept of defense ownership in his paper on South Korean and Japanese security policies. Joongi Kim continues the discussion of national security as he looks at varied reactions to foreign ownership of domestic enterprises. The SAIS Review is happy to celebrate the winners of this year's student essay contest. Erica Shein, winner of the 2007 SAIS Review Essay Contest, argues that local ownership of food distribution programs is critical to food security. Jennifer Murray, winner of the 2007 SAIS Review Photo Essay Contest, documents Senegal's informal sector. Pierre Habshi, winner of the 2007 SAIS Review Book Review Contest, discusses Hezbollah: The Changing Face of Terrorism, a new book by Judith Palmer Harik. The issue concludes with three more reviews, of William Easterly's The White Man's Burden: How the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done so Much Ill and So Little Good, Paul Kennedy's The Parliament of Man: The Past, Present, and Future of the United Nations, and The Arab Economies in a Changing World by Marcus Noland and Howard Pack. The articles in...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,939
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,995

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,241 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œSAIS review of international affairsMême sujetLand Rights and ReformsTravaux en français237 207