The Future of Drilling-Grade Barite Weight Material - A Case for aSubstitute Specification
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Future of Drilling-Grade Barite Weight Material—A Case for a Substitute Specification J. R. Bruton; J. R. Bruton M-I Swaco Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar J. Bacho; J. Bacho M-I Swaco Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar J. A. Newcaster J. A. Newcaster M-I Swaco Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, September 2006. Paper Number: SPE-103135-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/103135-MS Published: September 24 2006 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Get Permissions Search Site Citation Bruton, J. R., Bacho, J., and J. A. Newcaster. "The Future of Drilling-Grade Barite Weight Material—A Case for a Substitute Specification." Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, September 2006. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/103135-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search Abstract Drilling grade barite, the fundamental drilling fluids "weight material" for over 8 decades, remains the primary source of ore product to adjust drilling mud densities around the world. However, quality, economically viable, and attainable supplies of 4.2 specific gravity barite ore for oilfield use are rapidly depleting. This is particularly true in the North American market, where significant foreign imports of barite ore are required to meet high demands from deepwater, Central US, and Western Canada drilling regimes. Without significant worldwide investments to locate and produce material to meet current API 4.2 s.g. and contaminant specifications, it is unlikely that producers of drilling grade barite will be able to supply the industry with a low-cost product in just a few short years. A viable alternative for less critical drilling applications is to use 4.10 specific gravity ore that possesses all the quality specifications of the current material.Industry acceptance of this reduced specific gravity material, co-existing with the current standard, could extend barite supplies by 5 years, or more, with only modest investment. The intent of this paper is to share results from a strategy now being undertaken to introduce and demonstrate the viability of the substitute specification ore in US applications. Also presented are laboratory studies that show that use of the 4.10-s.g. substitute will have minimal impact on the performance of most drilling fluids. Keywords: drilling fluid chemistry, drilling fluid formulation, drilling grade barite, drilling fluid property, investment, initial yp, drilling fluid selection and formulation, Upstream Oil & Gas, concentration, drilling fluids and materials Subjects: Drilling Fluids and Materials, Drilling fluid selection and formulation (chemistry, properties) Copyright 2006, Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle