Self‐Induced Compositional Variations in <scp>GaAs/AlGaAs</scp> Core‐Shell Nanowires
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Semiconductor nanowires (NWs) have promising properties for optoelectronic devices such as solar cells and light emitting diodes. For the development of such NW‐based devices, the correlation between structural features, composition, and optoelectronic properties of the NWs must be well understood. This task can be challenging as the growth can induce large NW‐to‐NW variations. As a statistical meaningful sampling at the required spatial resolution by multiple techniques would be very time consuming, correlated studies where the exact same NWs are characterized optically and structurally by different techniques are an alternative [1]. In this study, the same single self‐catalyzed GaAs/AlGaAs core‐shell NW is studied using micro‐photoluminescence (µ‐PL) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). After conventional TEM, cross‐sections of two regions of the same NW were made using focused ion beam (FIB) to obtain a 3D impression of the NW. To study variations in the shell, a cross‐section was made perpendicular to the growth direction from the lower half of the NW, and to study variations in the tip a section was made perpendicular to the ‐1‐12‐direction from the top of the NW (Fig. 1(a)). The cross‐sections were studied using high‐angle annular dark‐field scanning TEM (HAADF STEM) and quantitative electron‐dispersive x‐ray spectroscopy (EDS) to reveal compositional variations in the different directions of the NW. The NWs in the growth batch are mostly defect free zinc blende (ZB), with stacking faults and a wurtzite (WZ) region towards the tip area (Fig. 1(b‐c)). µ‐PL of 17 studied NWs shows a signal at the ZB GaAs free exciton energy at 12 K. About half of the NWs also have an additional PL signal at higher energy, as can be seen in Fig. 1(e). Compositional variations in the AlGaAs shell of the NWs could possibly explain this high‐energy PL emission in the 1.6‐1.8 eV energy range [2]. In both cross‐sections (Fig. 1(d) and Fig. 2) this type of structure, with narrow Al‐rich and Al‐deficient bands parallel to the facets of the NW, is visible. Quantitative EDS maps based on the zeta‐method [3] (Fig. 3(a)) shows that the Al concentration in the Al deficient bands for the observed widths is too high to explain the sharp PL emission in the range 1.6‐1.8 eV. In addition to the shell, the tip region also depicts compositional variations. These features were only visible in the cross‐section normal to the ‐1‐12 ‐ direction (Fig. 1(d) and 2(b)) and not apparent by conventional TEM imaging (Fig. 1(c)). Quantitative EDS (Fig. 3(b)) shows that the Al concentration is varying within the tip. Correlated studies on the very same NW including µ‐PL, conventional TEM, FIB preparation in different directions and quantitative EDS are required to visualize and explain self‐induced compositional variations and peculiar optical characteristics within these GaAs/AlGaAs core‐shell NWs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».