MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4248013525 · doi:10.7588/worllitetoda.92.6.0076

[sans titre]

2018· article· W4248013525 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul E. Love

Notice bibliographique

RevueWorld Literature Today · 2018
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueNeurology and Historical Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryNarrativeBiographyLiteratureIronyHistoryArtClassics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

revisiting his poetry to find where Malva might fit among all the omissions. Malva is as much a triumphant meditation on disability as it is a fiercely revisionist biography. Often preoccupied with the question of how she and her deceased friends fit into the “natural,” Malva at one point launches into a beautiful defense of “us, the mutants, the semi-snouted, doublebilled , triple-footed,” concluding, “We exist, all right. . . . We are the audience, the witnesses .” Another striking moment comes immediately after this as we find ourselves back on earth, watching an unexpected alliance form between Marietje and Neruda’s covert love interest at the moment. Regrettably , the dual setting dissolves as the book goes on, along with the narrative structure it could have added to the tenuous chronology of this wending cerebral journey. Peeters misses no chance to show her poetic strength, a fact that is well preserved in Vivien Glass’s rich translations: “At barely twenty years of age, my mother had to wave goodbye to her cushy personal life, toodleoo to tempo dulu, the good old days, gone before the rest of the colony even cottoned on, though some of the balustrades were already broken and the legs of the colonials’ rocking chairs getting rickety.” If the narration is at times overprone to alliteration and triplicate description, we can chalk that up to Malva’s unique brand of irony and be glad, in the end, that we got to know her after all these years. Grant Schatzman University of Oklahoma Hamid Sulaiman Freedom Hospital: A Syrian Story Trans. Francesca Barrie. Northampton, Massachusetts. Interlink Books. 2018 (©2016). 283 pages. “Go on, pour,” Yasmin says as she has Abu Azab cauterize the leg of a rebel soldier with scalding hot oil after she has amputated it with a hacksaw in the middle of the street. If you thought that a graphic novel about Syria called Freedom Hospital was going to be uplifting, Hamid Sulaiman’s book challenges you to think more deeply about what has happened there since 2012. The story moves from images of mutilated children and beheadings to love stories, soccer, and hallucinogens. True, at the narrative’s heart is the idealism of a woman, Yasmin, and her attempts to maintain a hospital in the fictional town of Houria (Freedom) under Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria during the civil war. But Sulaiman uses his narrative to show the complexity that accompanied Syria’s descent into chaos, as rival opponents of the Assad government turned on one another and civilians were caught in the middle: soldiers defect and then return to the regime, the rebel armies splinter and give birth to the Islamic State, and Russianmade weapons kill people on all sides. Sure, Assad’s regime comes out looking bad, but this is a more complicated critique of what happened to Syria than simply blaming the government. It is an attempt to come to grips with an overwhelming number of personal tragedies in a civil war. If Freedom Hospital reads as chaotic and violent, that’s in part what Sulaiman is trying to communicate. As his postscript notes, “I don’t think anyone can capture exactly what is happening in Syria. . . . I chose to blend fiction and fact to avoid having to explain what was true or false.” The story reflects this in both its narrative and its images. It is difficult for characters to know who is on whose side or what is happening elsewhere. Fear of snipers, an airstrike sensed by a cat, and the shadowy faces and conversations in the blackness all communicate a sense of uncertainty and imminent danger from unknown sources. There is no denying that there is something optimistic in the story of Freedom Hospital. Yasmin truly believes in her mission to help people. As events unfold throughout the story, however, it seems that Sulaiman shares the perspective of his main protagonist: “I’m neither a pessimist nor an optimist. I am a realist.” Paul Love Al Akhawayn University, Morocco Pierre Michon Tablée, suivi de Fraternité Paris. Editions de l’Herne. 2017. 68 pages. Agnès Castiglione & Dominique Viart Cahier Michon Paris. Editions de l’Herne. 2017. 342 pages. In...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,979
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,000

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,005
Communication savante0,0070,004
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0210,011

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,262
Écart entre enseignants0,244 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueWorld Literature TodayMême sujetNeurology and Historical StudiesTravaux en français237 207