Optimizing Acid Treatments With the Use of Jet Blasting Tool
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Optimizing Acid Treatments With the Use of Jet Blasting Tool Ahmed Dahroug; Ahmed Dahroug ADCO (Abu-Dhabi Company For Onshore Oil Operations) Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Barry Brown; Barry Brown ADCO (Abu-Dhabi Company For Onshore Oil Operations) Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Mansour Shaheen Mansour Shaheen Schlumberger Dowell Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable, Houston, Texas, March 2001. Paper Number: SPE-68364-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/68364-MS Published: March 07 2001 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Dahroug, Ahmed, Brown, Barry, and Mansour Shaheen. "Optimizing Acid Treatments With the Use of Jet Blasting Tool." Paper presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable, Houston, Texas, March 2001. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/68364-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search Abstract Coiled Tubing is a common method of diverting treatment fluids into wellbore formations in open hole and cased hole completions. The efficiency of the treatment can be significantly improved by increasing the impact force of the fluid on the formation.The recently developed JetBlaster™ Tool has been used on some cases as the optimum BHA that can be used with Coiled Tubing for the efficient delivery of treatment fluids. The software JetADVISOR supports system hydraulic analysis and the design of the tool configuration in terms of nozzle and orifice diameter. This allows optimization of jet impact force or hydraulic horsepower, and ensures a sufficiently high rotational speed to effectively divert the treatment around the circumference of the wellbore. The addition of velocity increases the affectivity of the treatment.In order to assist evaluation of the efficiency of the technique we have primarily attempted to treat a well that had formation drilling damage with the tool while pumping a non corrosive fluid that has no direct chemical reaction with the formation filter cake. The well was then put on the test to see the increase in production and wellhead pressure and the results recorded and compared. Then the same treatment was repeated but while jetting acid, then the well was once again put on test. Keywords: abu-dhabi company, tool ahmed dahroug spe, coiled tubing operations, mansour shaheen spe schlumberger dowell, reservoir surveillance, barry brown spe adco, wellbore, application, production control, society of petroleum engineers Subjects: Drilling Operations, Drilling Fluids and Materials, Well & Reservoir Surveillance and Monitoring, Formation Evaluation & Management, Acidizing, Completion Installation and Operations, Well Intervention, Coiled tubing operations, Well Operations, Optimization and Stimulation Copyright 2001, Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».