AAML0523: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group On the Efficacy of Clofarabine in Combination with Cytarabine in Pediatric Patients with Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 3604 Background: Clofarabine is a nucleoside analog that potently inhibits ribonucleotide reductase and DNA polymerase α. The biochemical modulation of cytarabine by clofarabine via inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase is well established, and this combination has been studied in adults with relapsed AML1, 2. We have previously reported the toxicity profile of the Phase I portion of AAML05233. Here, we report the Phase II portion of AAML0523 in children with relapsed AML. Study Design: Clofarabine and cytarabine were administered on days 1–5. Cytarabine (1 gm/m2) was given 4 hours after the start of clofarabine to optimize the biochemical modulation of ara-CTP. Patients were encouraged to receive 2 cycles of induction therapy, based on previous trials demonstrating response after a second cycle in those without response after the first4. The Phase I portion of AAML0523 determined that clofarabine at a dose of 52 mg/m2/day can be given safely in combination with cytarabine3. Results: 47 eligible AML patients were enrolled at the dose of 52 mg/m2 of clofarabine. One patient did not have bone marrow evaluation after course 1 and therefore was not evaluable for response. The median age at study entry was 14.1, the median length of CR1 was 306 days (range 35–2212), 44 patients were in first relapse, and 3 were primary refractory. Only 4 had prior stem cell transplant. The most common toxicities grade 3 or higher were: febrile neutropenia (36%), diarrhea (12%), nausea (11%), infection (51%), and hypokalemia (24 %). Four patients had capillary leak syndrome after the first cycle. There were no treatment-related deaths in AML patients. Response was measured as best response after up to 2 cycles of Induction. Of the 46 patients evaluable for response, 16 (35%) had complete response (CR), 5 (11%) CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp), 14 stable disease (SD), and 11 had progressive disease (PD). Of the 21 responders, 11 had SD after induction course 1 but then achieved CR or CRp after course 2. However, 8 non-responders who achieved SD after course 1 were then taken off study, mostly at physician's discretion to pursue other therapy. Four patients met conventional criteria for CRi (complete response with incomplete count recovery) and then received stem cell transplant, but this was not included among the study response definitions. Among all responders, median time to relapse was 374.5 days (range 42–2212), 16 went on to HSCT, and 3-year overall survival was 51±34%. Conclusions: The overall response rate (ORR) of 46 % (21 patients) did not meet the statistical threshold for efficacy of 50% (23 patients) developed for this study. Factors involving study compliance (8 SD patients did not receive course 2; 4 CRi patients did not await count recovery) may have affected the ORR. However, this non-anthracycline salvage regimen may be effective as a bridge to potentially curative HSCT in this high risk patient population. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Clofarabine is approved for use in ALL in second relapse. This presentation will discuss a clinical trial using clofarabine for children with AML in first relapse.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».