Proceedings of the 7th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ASSETS 2005 is the seventh in the ACM's series of conferences sponsored by SIGACCESS (formerly SIGCAPH). As in the past, ASSETS 2005 focuses its attention on topics related to design, development, and application of computer-based methodologies to achieve the objectives of universal access, with special attention to the needs of people of al ages and with different capabilities. The ASSETS series of conferences is aimed at providing a technical forum for presenting and disseminating innovative research results that cover either (1) applications of computing and information technologies to provide assistive systems to persons with special needs, or (2) investigation of computing technologies and their use by persons with disabilities. This year, the conference opened with a plenary address by Dr. Clayton Lewis, Professor of Computer Science at the University of Colorado at Boulder. His presentation was titled "Bridges for the Mind: Opportunities for Research on Cognitive Disabilities. ASSETS 2005 is the first event of this conference series to be presented on an annual basis - the previous ASSETS conferences have been held bi-annually. The change to an annual event is in response to the growth of the field and the increasing interest in a more frequent technical venue and discussion forum. As in previous years, the conference is organized in such a way to promote an open forum where researchers, practitioners, educators, and students can present their ideas as formal papers, posters, demonstrations, as well as engage in dialogue, sharing experiences, objectives, accomplishments and different perspectives. In this tradition, ASSETS 2005 is developed as a single-track conference, where formal presentations, interactive sessions, panels, and social events alternate throughout the conference program. The technical program is composed of 23 regular papers, selected by the international program committee out of a total of 60 submissions. The accepted submissions represent the work of 58 authors from Canada, Chile, India, Japan, Sweden, UK, and the USA. The papers are organized in six thematic sessions. The program also includes two sessions dedicated to the presentation of cutting-edge results and work-in-progress, in the form of demos and posters. Posters and demos were submitted in response to a separate call for papers, which generated 30 submissions, of which 21 were selected for presentation. A 2-page abstract for each poster and demo appears in these proceedings. Both technical papers and poster/demo papers were subjected to a competitive peer-review process, ensuring ensured that the papers included in these proceedings represent the state-of-the-art in the field. The program is completed by a panel and the doctoral consortium. The panel brings together researchers, government, and industry representatives to discuss the duality between universal access and assistive technologies. The doctoral consortium, chaired by Julie Jacko, offers an opportunity to doctoral students to present their ideas to both peers and a selected pool of experts. In addition, the main conference includes a session dedicated to the doctoral consortium, providing an opportunity for participants to share their research with the entire ASSETS audience. One doctoral student, selected by the doctoral consortium committee, will present the closing plenary for ASSETS 2005.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,186 | 0,087 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».