Abstract LB-269: Development of a vaccine model to track the CD8-specific response in Mauritius cynomolgus monkey
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Manipulating the immune system to achieve therapeutic efficacy in cancer treatment has led to a new class of drugs that brought lasting remissions to many patients who had run out of options. The development of new immunotherapy aimed at targeting cancer cells requires the ability to monitor specifically the immune response. Although CD8 T cells play a crucial role in this process, no equivalent of the traditional T-cell-dependent antibody response (TDAR) assay, which evaluates the T-helper immune response, is currently available. Since cancer immunotherapy agents are often tested in non-tumor bearing NHP for safety assessment, the animal models currently available do not allow monitoring of potential exaggerated pharmacology and efficacy of these new drug candidates.Objectives The goal of this study was to develop an NHP vaccination model that specifically elicits a CTL response, in order to evaluate the efficacy in exacerbating the Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte (CTL) response.Experimental Procedures To reach this goal, MHC-genotyped Mauritian cynomolgus macaques (MCMs) were immunized with 3 replication incompetent recombinant adenovirus serotype 5 (Ad5) vectors, each containing the coding sequence for Gag, Nef or Pol SIV proteins. Such model allowed monitoring of the CD8 T cell activation in lieu of a tumor or live virus model. MCMs were distributed into 3 groups: one control group and 2 groups which received two intramuscular injection of the adenovirusrs spaced by 4 or 8 weeks. The immune response was monitored with blood samples taken on a weekly basis for up to 12 weeks. Blood samples were used to 1) characterize the different CD8-positive sub-populations by Tetramer staining and Immunophenotyping; 2) to correlate the immunophenotyping profile obtained with functional assays such as ex vivo recall response and IFNγ ELIspot.Results Of the three groups tested, MCM monkeys receiving 2 injections 8 weeks apart showed the more robust CD8 T cell response. This response was mainly characterized by a proliferation profile (Ki67-positive cells), the expression of activation markers at the surface of CD8 T cells and antigen specific responses of the CD8 T cells. Of the three Gag, Pol and Nef proteins, immunization with Nef gave the most robust response, as observed by the IFNγ ELIspot results and by the presence of a Nef-specific CD8-specific subpopulation observed by tetramer staining. No changes in the distribution of T, B, NK, Treg or Memory T cells was observed between the 3 groups.Conclusion The results obtained during the course of this study suggests that the described CD8-specific vaccination model using Mauritius cynomolgus macaques is a promising model to evaluate the efficacy and potential exaggerated pharmacology of new drug candidates targeting CD8 T cells.Citation Format: Richard Graveline, Morad Haida, Carolyne Dumont, Rana Samadfam, Dominic Poulin, Marie-Soleil Piche. Development of a vaccine model to track the CD8-specific response in Mauritius cynomolgus monkey [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-269.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».