MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4248803742 · doi:10.2523/74474-ms

Designing Invert Drilling Fluids to Yield Environmentally Friendly Drilled Cuttings

2002· article· en· W4248803742 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
F.B. Growcock, G. W. Curtis, B. Hoxha, W.S. Brooks, J.E. Candler

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of IADC/SPE Drilling Conference · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueDrilling and Well Engineering
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesUniversity of Calgary
Mots-clésDrillingCitationEngineeringWorld Wide WebComputer scienceLibrary scienceMechanical engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Designing Invert Drilling Fluids to Yield Environmentally Friendly Drilled Cuttings F.B. Growcock; F.B. Growcock M-I Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar G.W. Curtis; G.W. Curtis M-I Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar B. Hoxha; B. Hoxha M-I Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar W.S. Brooks; W.S. Brooks M-I Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar J.E. Candler J.E. Candler M-I Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Dallas, Texas, February 2002. Paper Number: SPE-74474-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/74474-MS Published: February 26 2002 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Growcock, F.B., Curtis, G.W., Hoxha, B., Brooks, W.S., and J.E. Candler. "Designing Invert Drilling Fluids to Yield Environmentally Friendly Drilled Cuttings." Paper presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Dallas, Texas, February 2002. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/74474-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractAn invert emulsion drilling fluid has been developed that possesses the drilling properties of conventional invert muds, yet can be discharged onto land as a soil enhancer. The individual components of this Soil-Enhancing Synthetic Based Mud (SE-SBM) — base fluid, internal polar phase, emulsion stabilizers, wetting agents, fluid-loss-control agents and weighting material — also possess these attractive features.One version of the SE-SBM produces mud-laden cuttings that can be land-farmed directly without pretreatment. Where discharges are severely restricted with respect to salt, oil and/or grease content, another version of the SE-SBM is particularly well suited for pretreatment of the cuttings in a bioreactor or other rapid biotreatment technique.IntroductionDevelopment of synthetic-based muds (SBM) as alternatives to conventional oil-based muds (OBM) in offshore operations was precipitated by toxicity and biodegradability concerns. These focused on the fate and effects of mud-laden drilled cuttings discharged into the sea, as well as worker safety. Cuttings disposal is of paramount importance also for onshore applications. However, the environmental issues focus primarily on usability of the land on which the cuttings are discharged and contamination of ground water1,2 with chloride salts and hydrocarbons. Although the advent of SBM has greatly improved the environmental acceptability of non-aqueous drilling fluids both offshore and onshore, current SBM formulations still present problems for direct land treatment (spreading and farming) of mud-laden cuttings generated in onshore operations. The concerns with pollution of soil and groundwater by SBM and OBM have led to increasingly strict government regulations.Although land treatment is considered among the most acceptable waste disposal methods for cuttings from onshore operations, there is a litany of other ways to deal with invert mud-laden cuttings. 3 These include the following:landfill disposalbioremediation—composting, phytoextraction, vermiculture and bioreactionstabilization/solidification—briquetting and fixation with silicates or fly ashextraction or washing—oil, detergents and solventsthermal treatment—incineration and distillation, including thermal desorption and hammermillingOne of the most serious disadvantages of land treatment is the increasingly stringent limit on total oil and grease, salts (electrical conductivity) and heavy metals. For land treatment to continue to be a viable disposal option, OBM- and SBM-laden cuttings need to be (a) pretreated to remove the offensive constituents, or (b) designed from the outset to yield an innocuous product, or better yet, a product that enhances the value of the soil. Recently, a rapid bioreactor technique was developed that can reduce residual Synthetic on Cuttings (RSC) to < 1% w/w within days. 4 Whether or not drilled cuttings are pretreated before land application, environmental requirements need to be considered as much as drilling properties in the design of the drilling fluid.Invert emulsion muds generally contain some components, such as excess lime and clays, that are intrinsically beneficial to many soils. 5 Low pH (< 5. 5) is detrimental to most agricultural crops, and often soil needs to be treated with an alkaline material-like lime to counteract the effects of low pH. Clays can act as soil conditioners, especially for sandy soil, by improving its texture and increasing its water-holding capacity. In addition, some organics, especially those similar to humus, serve as nutrients and conditioners. 6,7The major components of invert emulsion muds, on the other hand, may not be so beneficial. These include (a) base fluid; (b) emulsifier/wetting agent; (d) internal (aqueous or polar) phase; (e) fluid-loss-control agent (FLCA) and (e) weighting material. Any one of these may affect seed germination, plant growth and/or the life cycle of native fauna, e. g. earthworms. A typical SBM used onshore is a hydrocarbon-based fluid formulated with a surfactant package of moderate toxicity, CaCl2 brine, an asphaltic material and barite. Keywords: drilling fluid selection and formulation, drilling fluids and materials, growcock, toxicity, drilling fluid property, emulsifier package, curtis, emulsifier, internal phase, drilling fluid chemistry Subjects: Drilling Fluids and Materials, Drilling fluid selection and formulation (chemistry, properties) This content is only available via PDF. 2002. IADC/SPE Drilling Conference You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,181
Écart entre enseignants0,164 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of IADC/SPE Drilling ConferenceMême sujetDrilling and Well EngineeringTravaux en français237 207