Notice bibliographique
Résumé
tba Submission Video Link https://vimeo.com/188828000 Artist Statement As an artist I approach my practice as a conduit for imagining alternate political and personal realities in which the non-human animals are afforded relational and differentiated rights of membership in a multispecies community. The intention of such work is to stir the moral imagination of my viewer. By not simply raising indignation at abuse and neglect, not presenting (yet again) an image of the animal other as a passive victim, my purpose is to envision the animals we are entangled with as neighbours, friends and members of disparate communities. Speciation Dance is a new media installation work that challenges established relationships between human and nonhuman animals. It represents a progression in my attempts to abandon the presumptive act of speaking for the animal other. Rather, this work joins animal and human voices in hopes of decentering the anthropocentrism inherent in art making. Project Description: Speciation Dance A small but strategic desire exists within humanity to preserve certain charismatic animal species from extinction; this has led to a dance both epic and intimate, which paradoxically attempts to maintain natural wildness by crafting an elaborate system of interspecies dependency. This contradiction is most visible in the conservation of whooping cranes. This species has come to emblemize the extreme commitment humans have made to the management of creatures we ourselves have driven to near nonexistence. In the performative video work, Speciation Dance, I focus on slippages in identity for both human-surrogate-mates and animals in captive breeding programs. In these relationships scientists and conservation workers don cobbled together costumes and assume monastic vows of silence to prevent their charges from becoming too accustomed to humans. But perhaps more importantly, these orniphiles (bird lovers) encourage the crane to imprint upon their bird persona. When a creature imprints upon an individual outside of their species it disrupts speciation, the inbred impulse to be attracted only to one's own kind. Imprinting on a human distorts animal identity; seeing itself as human an animal will have no desire to copulate with its own species. As the performers in Speciation Dance transform into bird/people we hear ornithologist George Archibald describing his cross-species relationship with a crane named Tex. George and Tex’s story inspired this piece, and George’s narrative, assembled from found audio recordings, gives humor and context to the work. In this 6-minute two-channel video work, I am documenting two professional dancers from the Nova Dance Collective as they flirt with becoming-animal. Stepping into the role of a liminal being, neither human nor bird, they perform as humans-come-whooping cranes. Dipping, leaping, strutting and extending prosthetic heads to the sky, they attempt to relate to each other through the embodied language of both species. Trying to court and arouse one another, the performers convey the beautiful absurdity of such a futile act.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,741 | 0,456 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».