MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4249129350 · doi:10.2118/19702-ms

Application of Electromagnetic Scanning to an Australian Frontier Basin with Complex Bathymetry

2008· article· en· W4249129350 sur OpenAlexaff
David Monk, Jim Ross, Fredrich Roth, Claudia Twarz

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of Offshore Technology Conference · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueGeological and Geophysical Studies
Établissements canadiensApache (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeologyProspectivity mappingBathymetrySubmarine pipelineHydrocarbon explorationGeobiologyOverburdenTectonicsSeismologyRegional geologyGemologyMining engineeringEngineering geologyStructural basinPaleontologyMetamorphic petrologyVolcanismGeotechnical engineeringOceanography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Apache is exploring a large block offshore Australia. Part of the area is covered with good quality 3D seismic and a number of prospects have been identified from this data. Additional potential prospects were inferred from 2D seismic in the relatively under-explored deep water area of the block. With the current high cost of 3D seismic and drilling programs, it was considered very important to high-grade the prospects and to correctly assess the prospectivity of the deep water area.Initially it was thought that traditional target-oriented CSEM surveys over each prospect would provide the required information. However, after further study, it was decided to cover the entire area with electromagnetic scanning. This approach provides a coarse 3D view of the entire area providing information not just about prospects identified from seismic, but potentially also revealing new hydrocarbon leads.A highly rugose seafloor in combination with a high resistive overburden of varying thickness appeared as a major concern for the scanning survey. A wide, deep submarine canyon provided both operational challenges and data processing issues. The rugosity of the seafloor and varying overburden thickness constitute significant local as well as regional variations to the background resistivity distribution, making it difficult to extract potentially hydrocarbon related anomalies from the scanning data.A novel approach to dealing with this problem was adopted, which takes advantage of complementary information from existing well logs and the available seismic data. A number of 1D inversions constrained by resistivity logs were performed at various locations across the survey. The results of the 1D inversions were then used to build a reference resistivity model that conforms to the bathymetry and the seismically derived overburden thickness. Detailed 3D simulation of the scanning survey for this resistivity model generated synthetic reference responses, which adequately account for most of the bathymetry and overburden related variations in the scanning data. Using these synthetic reference responses to normalize the scanning data, a number of interesting anomalies became apparent, one of which coincides with a known oil reservoir. The same anomalies had been masked by regional trends in previous results obtained by conventional single-receiver referencing.The results obtained significantly increased our confidence in the interpretation of the scanning data and highlight the increased value obtained from an integrated analysis with complementary geophysical data.Introduction. Electromagnetic scanning is a reconnaissance application of seabed logging [1] which employs coarse grid acquisition to assess the prospectivity of large areas [2], [3]. The idea is to detect potentially hydrocarbon-bearing resistive formations independent of their seismic expression and high-grade those prospects already identified from seismic data.We present results from a recent scanning survey conducted in an Australian offshore basin as part of a major exploration campaign involving modern 3D seismic acquisition and the drilling of exploration wells. The survey covered an extensive area of 1650 square km where water depths range from approximately 100 m to more than 2500 m. The area hosts a producing oil reservoir and a number of exploration prospects previously identified from 2D and 3D seismic, which had been available over part of the survey area.The scanned basin is characterized by a highly rugose seafloor topography and a complex geology with rock properties that have challenged seismic interpretation in the past. From a seabed logging perspective, the complexity of the geology manifests itself mainly through a carbonate-dominated overburden of largely varying thickness, where resistivity data from wells indicate a sharp increase in resistivity with depth. The prospects are located in the stratigraphic sequence below the overburden at 400-3500 m depth below seafloor and range from about 10 to 20 square km in size.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,041
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,081

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,218
Écart entre enseignants0,195 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of Offshore Technology ConferenceMême sujetGeological and Geophysical StudiesTravaux en français237 207