MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4249174129 · doi:10.37575/b/med/0038

Adu, K.K. and Adjei, E. (2018). The phenomenon of data loss and cyber security issues in Ghana. Foresight, 20(2), 150–61. Ahmed, M.T.U., Bhuiya, N.I. and Rahman, M.M. (2017). A secure enterprise architecture focused on security and technology-transformation (SEAST), The 12th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, (ICITST-2017), Cambridge, UK, 11–4/12/2017. Alanazi, S.T., Anbar, M., Ebad, S.A., Karuppayah, S. and Al-Ani, H.A. (2020). Theory-based model and prediction analysis of information security compliance behavior in the Saudi healthcare sector. Symmetry, 12(9), 1544. DOI: 10.3390/sym12091544 Alateyah, S.A., Crowder, R.M. and Wills, G.B. (2013). Identified factors affecting the citizen’s intention to adopt e-government in Saudi Arabia. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 7(8), 904–12. Antonino, P., Duszynski, S., Jung, C. and Rudolph, M. (2010). Indicator-based architecture-level security evaluation in a service-oriented environment. In: The Fourth European Conference on Software Architecture: Copenhagen, Denmark, 23–26/08/2010. DOI: 10.1145/1842752.1842795. Chaturvedi, M., Gupta, M. and Bhattacharya, J. (2008). Cyber Security Infrastructure in India: A Study, Emerging Technologies in E-Government. Available at: http://www.csi-sigegov.org/emerging_pdf/9_70-84.pdf (Accessed on 15/11/2020). Dalol, M.H. (2018). Effectiveness of Accounting Information Systems in Light of Development of IT Infrastructure and Information Security. Master’s Dissertation, The Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza, Palestine. Dooley, K. (2001). Designing Large Scale LANs: Help for Network Designers. USA: O'Reilly Media. Ebad, S. (2018a) An exploratory study of ICT projects failure in emerging markets. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 21(2), 139–60. DOI: 10.1080/1097198X.2018.1462071. Ebad, S. (2018b). The influencing causes of software unavailability: A case study from industry. Software Practice and Experience, 48(5), 1056–76. DOI: 10.1002/spe.2569. Hashizume, K., Rosado, D.G., Fernández-Medina, E. and Fernandez, E.B. (2013). An analysis of security issues for cloud computing. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 4(5), n/a. DOI: 10.1186/1869-0238-4-5. Kirby, L. (2015). Beyond Cyber Security: Protecting Your IT Infrastructure. Available at https://uptimeinstitute.com/images/Documents/ProtectingYourITInfrastructure.pdf (accessed on 15/11/2020). Lethbridge, T.C., Sim, S.E. and Singer, J. (2005). Studying software engineers: Data collection techniques for software field studies. Empirical Software Engineering, 10(3), 311–41. Marrone, M. and Kolbe, L.M. (2011). Impact of IT service management frameworks on the IT organization. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 3(1), 5–18. Mastelic, T. and Brandic, I. (2013). TimeCap: Methodology for comparing IT infrastructures based on time and capacity metrics. In: The IEEE 6th International Conference on Cloud Computing, 131–8, Santa Clara, CA, USA, 28/06–03/07/2013. Mimura, M. and Suga, Y. (2019). Filtering malicious JavaScript code with Doc2Vec on an imbalanced dataset. In: The 14th Asia Joint Conference on Information Security (AsiaJCIS), Kobe, Japan, 24–31/08/2019. Pearlson, K.E., Saunders, C.S. and Galletta, D.F. (2019). Managing and Using Information Systems. 5th edition, USA: Wiley. Popp, K. and Meyer, R. (2011). Profit from Software Ecosystems Models, Ecosystems and Partnerships in the Software Industry. Norderstedt, Germany: Books on Demand. Priem, R. (2020). Distributed ledger technology for securities clearing and settlement: Benefits, risks, and regulatory implications. Financial Innovation, 6(11), n/a. DOI: 10.1186/s40854-019-0169-6. Rabii, L. and Abdelaziz, D. (2015). Comparison of e-readiness composite indicators, The 15th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA), Marrakech, Morocco, 14–16/12/2015. Sanchez-Nielsen, E., Padron-Ferrer, A. and Marreo-Estevez, F. (2011). A multi-agent system for incident management solutions on IT infrastructures. In: The 14th Conference of the Spanish Association for Artificial Intelligence (CAEPIA 2011), La Laguna, Spain, 07–11/11/2011. Schoenfisch, J, Meilicke, C., Stülpnagel, J.V. and Ortmann, J (2018). Root cause analysis in IT infrastructures using ontologies and abduction in Markov logic networks. Information Systems, 74(2), 103–16. Shang, S. and Seddon, P.B. (2000). A comprehensive framework for classifying the benefits of ERP systems. In: The 2000 American Conference of Information Systems, Long Beach, California, 10–13/08/2000. Shoffner, M., Owen, P., Mostafa, J., Lamm, B., Wang, X., Schmitt, C.P. and Ahalt S.C. (2013). The secure medical research workspace: An IT infrastructure to enable secure research on clinical data. Clinical and Translational Science, 6 (3), 222–5. Shrivastava, A.K. (2015). The impact assessment of IT Infrastructure on information security: a survey report. In: International Conference on Inf

2021· article· en· W4249174129 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueScientific Journal of King Faisal University Basic and Applied Sciences · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueBusiness and Economic Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineDiabetes mellitusMyocardial infarctionBlood pressureInternal medicineCoronary artery diseaseCardiologyEpidemiologyIncidence (geometry)DiseaseEndocrinology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Few epidemiological studies have discussed the gender-specific prevalence of ischemic heart disease (IHD). We aimed to investigate the gender-specific prevalence of IHD among Saudi patients visiting the emergency department and if it is affected by diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension. Three hundred patients were recruited from Prince Sultan Cardiac Center in Al Ahsa, KSA. Hypertension was identified as systolic pressure equal to or more than 140 mmHg and/or diastolic pressure equal to or more than 90 mmHg or by the patient currently being on antihypertensive medication, and coronary artery disease (CAD) was diagnosed by electrocardiogram, cardiac markers, cardiac exercise testing or coronary angiography. Hypertension was found in 80% of males and 72% of females. A significantly higher rate of diabetes was noted in females (62%) compared to males (48%) (p<0.012). Co-existing diabetes and hypertension was found in 70% of females as compared to 38% of males. The occurrence of IHD in males was significantly higher than that in females (p<0.001). However, the incidence of myocardial infarction was greater in females (52%) compared to males (38%) (p<0.035). Co-existing hypertension and diabetes may affect the gender prevalence of myocardial infarction among emergency department patients, with more infarctions being noted among females. This finding helps to guide the treatment strategy for both genders.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,289
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,914

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,107
Tête enseignante GPT0,346
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle