MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4249341765 · doi:10.5325/weslmethstud.11.2.0216

Saved to Save and Saved to Serve: Perspectives on Salvation Army History

2019· article· en· W4249341765 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.

Notice bibliographique

RevueWesley and Methodist Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMilitary History and Strategy
Établissements canadiensRegent College
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSociologyScholarshipTerminologyWorshipOfficerInstitutionLawManagementSocial sciencePolitical sciencePhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As a retired Salvation Army (SA) officer and a teacher in an SA training institution, Harold Hill is to be expected to have a wide knowledge of the movement—both anecdotally and from scholarship. However, this book exceeds expectations in the insights it gives not only into the twists and turns of the first 150 years of the Booths' evangelistic enterprise, but also into contemporary debates.Framed as ‘a critical and analytical study’ that ‘attempts to explore the interaction between mission and world as it has impacted the Army's beliefs and practices’, Hill's work employs tools from social history, sociology, and theology. He begins with an overview of the history of the movement, and the appendices and glossary explain SA terminology, the structure of the Army and the Booth dynasty. Thus, a reader unfamiliar with the field can easily become orientated and engaged with the issues raised, as a family evangelistic effort enlarges to grapple with questions of core Christian belief and practice relating to issues such as organization, funding, training, and relationships with the existing churches.Hill has three chapters on the ecclesiology of the SA—Sect and Church, Leadership, and the Role of Women; then three chapters on SA theology—belief, diversity, and worship (including the sacraments), before chapters on social work at home and abroad, and finally a chapter focused on the global nature of the SA with some consideration of globalization or ‘glocalization’.While rightly drawing attention to the extraordinary growth of the SA and its international nature, and exploring the possible reasons for this, Hill does not minimize the contradictions within the SA and the tensions that have ebbed and flowed. Thus, he forcefully shows how completely autocratic William Booth's leadership was to the point of disowning several of his children when, as mature commissioned officers themselves, they disagreed with him, while he simultaneously argued for the importance of flexibility in responding to the evangelistic needs of the moment.Similarly, the author explores the contradiction between the staggeringly few females to achieve higher positions of leadership in the Army in the twentieth century and Catherine and William Booth's pioneering work in insisting on female equality. Intriguingly, he raises the possibility that it was the force of the Booths that enabled them to impose their will in this matter, but that there was a subsequent shift over time because of a more widespread conservative view of headship among the ranks and a reluctance to let women lead.In discussing the theological and practical issues raised by having full-time paid commissioned officers as well as soldiers, Hill gives an impressive array of quotes from Salvationists and others wrestling with the question of whether ‘ordination’ is by God or a representative of the Army, and whether all are ordained or only a few chosen ones. The interesting way he opens up discussion on issues like this makes his work applicable and useful for those of other Christian groups or denominations considering similar matters in their own setting.In introducing the theological statements of the SA, the author makes clear that William Booth had little interest in theology per se, and, indeed, feared it likely to divide and distract people from evangelization. Nevertheless, as Hill points out, the SA did and does have a theological stance, which he explores. At this point in the book, it seems unfortunate that he did not raise the question of Catherine's relationship to theology and mention the exploration that has begun recently to assess whether she was the driving force behind the SA's theology. It has long been clear from her publication in support of women preachers that she was not averse to theological reasoning. Hill does mention, at three points in his book, John Read's work in this field, and how Read has illuminated aspects of Catherine's thinking on issues such as the doctrine of Christian perfection and substitutionary atonement. But it would have been good to address the question of her theological contribution directly at the beginning of his chapters exploring SA theology.This is a highly readable book with the sort of anecdotes and quotations from SA sources that are acquired only from years of research and immersion in the field. Hill's work can be read profitably by a wide audience and used as a textbook.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,719
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,586

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,094
Tête enseignante GPT0,381
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle