MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4249609113 · doi:10.1182/blood.v124.21.88.88

A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravenous Magnesium for Sickle Cell Pain Crisis in Children

2014· article· en· W4249609113 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David C. Brousseau, James G. Scott, Oluwakemi Badaki, Deepika S. Darbari, Corrie E. Chumpitazi, Gladstone Airewele, Angela M. Ellison, Kim Smith‐Whitley, Prashant Mahajan, Sharada A. Sarnaik, T. Charles Casper, Larry Cook, Michael Dean, Julie C. Leonard, Monica L. Hulbert, Elizabeth Powell, Robert I. Liem, Robert W. Hickey, Lakshmanan Krishnamurti, Cheryl A. Hillery, Julie A. Panepinto

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineEmergency departmentSickle cell anemiaVaso-occlusive crisisRandomized controlled trialPlaceboPediatricsAnesthesiaEmergency medicineInternal medicineDiseasePsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: There are approximately 18,000 hospitalizations and 75,000 hospitalization days annually in the United States for children experiencing sickle cell vasoocclusive crises. Despite advances in the management of other comorbidities of sickle cell disease, little has changed in the management of sickle cell pain crises. Magnesium, a known vasodilator, anti-inflammatory and pain reliever, has the potential to alter the pathophysiology of pain crises, shortening length of stay and decreasing opioid use. A previous pilot study showed IV magnesium shortened length of stay compared to historical controls. A randomized trial conducted in Canada showed no decrease in length of stay with the use of intravenous magnesium. In the MAGiC (MAGnesium for children in Crisis) study, we hypothesized that the addition of intravenous (IV) magnesium to standard therapy would shorten hospital length of stay, result in decreased opioid use and improve quality of life for pediatric patients hospitalized with sickle cell pain crises. Methods: The MAGiC study was a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of IV magnesium versus normal saline for the treatment of pediatric sickle cell pain crisis conducted at 8 sites. Participating sites were members of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN), and collaborations between Pediatric Emergency Medicine physicians and Pediatric sickle cell experts facilitated enrollment. Children aged 4 to 21 years, with hemoglobin SS or hemoglobin SB° thalassemia were eligible if they required inpatient hospitalization after failing emergency department (ED) management for pain. Enrollment occurred at 8 sites between December 2010 and December 2013, with a total of 217 eligible site enrollment months. Children received 40 mg/kg of IV magnesium every eight hours for a total of 6 doses or normal saline placebo of equivalent volume (1 ml/kg). Randomization was stratified by site, age and hydroxyurea use. The primary outcome was length of stay from the time of first drug infusion until 12 hours after the last IV opioid dose or time of discharge, whichever occurred first. Secondary outcomes included opioid use, recorded as morphine equivalents, and quality of life, as measured using the PedsQL Sickle cell disease specific module, fatigue module and generic module. Side effects, specifically hypotension, weakness, warmth on infusion, or the development of acute chest syndrome (ACS) were documented. Using an intention-to-treat analysis, we compared length of stay using a Van Elteren test, stratified by the same factors used to stratify randomization. Results: 208 children were enrolled. Four children were excluded prior to receipt of any study drug, resulting in 101 children receiving magnesium and 103 receiving placebo. The 2 groups were similar with respect to age, sex ,genotype, weight, history of ACS or asthma, previous hospitalizations within the past three years and days of pain prior to arrival. The median time from first ED opioid to first study drug infusion was 7.4 hours, similar between the two groups. The median (interquartile range) length of stay was 56.0 (27.0 - 109.0) hours in the magnesium group compared to 47.0 (24.0 - 99.0) hours in the placebo group, p = 0.264. Patients who received magnesium received 1.46 mg/kg of morphine equivalents compared to 1.28 mg/kg in the placebo group (p=0.11). Quality of life scores were similar between the two groups after 48 hours on study drug and one week after discharge (p > 0.10 at both time points). Safety analysis revealed no differences in hypotension (3% for magnesium versus 1% for placebo) or weakness (7% versus 4%) between the 2 groups. Of those who received magnesium, 26% reported warmth on infusion compared to 2% of children who received placebo, p < .0001. Other adverse events, serious adverse events, and rehospitalizations within 7 days were similar between the groups. Conclusion: Intravenous magnesium does not shorten length of stay, lessen opioid use or improve quality of life in children who require hospitalization for sickle cell pain crisis. Close collaboration between Pediatric Emergency Medicine physicians and Pediatric Hematologists allows for the successful enrollment of large numbers of children in an acute intervention trial for children with sickle cell disease. Disclosures Off Label Use: magnesium for sickle cell pain crisis.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,030

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,214
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersTravaux en français237 207