MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4250150990 · doi:10.2523/78248-ms

The Geomechanical Prediction of Fracturing in the Circle Ridge Field, Wind River Basin, WY.

2002· article· en· W4250150990 sur OpenAlexaff
La Paul R., Hermanson Jan

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Établissements canadiensGolder Associates (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCitationGeologyRidgeStructural basinComputer scienceLibrary sciencePaleontology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Geomechanical Prediction of Fracturing in the Circle Ridge Field, Wind River Basin, WY Paul R. La Pointe; Paul R. La Pointe Golder Associates Inc. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Jan Hermanson Jan Hermanson Golder Associates Inc. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics Conference, Irving, Texas, October 2002. Paper Number: SPE-78248-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/78248-MS Published: October 20 2002 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation La Pointe, Paul R., and Jan Hermanson. "The Geomechanical Prediction of Fracturing in the Circle Ridge Field, Wind River Basin, WY." Paper presented at the SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics Conference, Irving, Texas, October 2002. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/78248-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics Conference Search Advanced Search AbstractImproved recovery of oil from fractured reservoirs often requires understanding how the intensity and orientation of natural fractures vary throughout the reservoir or field. Image logs or core provide excellent fracture data on these fracture parameters in the vicinity of a well, but these often still leave a large portion of the reservoir unknown. Modern 3D landbased seismic can be used to help constrain fracture intensity and directionality in the critical regions between wells, but acquisition and processing may be technically difficult or uneconomic, particularly in older onshore fields where optimized tertiary recovery schemes could increase recovery.Many important fractured oil reservoirs form in a compressional setting in which there have been various episodes of folding and faulting. The faulting can be quite complex, and involve reverse or thrust faulting, as well as extensional (normal) faulting. Because these folding and faulting events probably represent the peak strain events that the reservoir has experienced, it is likely that the reservoirscale fracturing developed in response to one or more of these events. Thus, if the strain history could be technically and economically mapped and compared to fracture data from image logs or core, it would be possible to constrain the orientations and intensity of fracturing throughout the reservoir.This process was carried out at the Circle Ridge Field, in which the fracturing in the Tensleep and Phosphoria Formations controls the efficiency of recovery processes. A 3D palinspastic reconstruction of the strain history for the folding and faulting of this Field was carried out. The strain pattern developed after each stage of deformation was compared to image log and surface fracture data. It was found that the strain produced by the initial folding event predicts fracture orientations and intensity variations quite accurately throughout various structural blocks, and that later faulting events do not seem to have influenced the fracture pattern except in the immediate vicinity of the large faults. This geomechanically-based model of fracturing is being used as the basis for designing tertiary recovery processes for the Field.IntroductionUltimate recovery from reservoirs where fractures dominate reservoir-scale permeability are often quite low, sometimes no more than 5% or 10% of the estimated original oil or gas in place. This represents a substantial resource left behind.The reasons for low recoveries arise from the substantial permeability contrast between the matrix and the fractures, and the often highly heterogeneous spatial distribution and connectivity of these fractures throughout the reservoir. The type of secondary or tertiary recovery process that may work best, the design of this process, the orientation of wells, the effectiveness of completions, as well as other engineering considerations are all very sensitive to the geometry and properties of fractures that are on the scale of tens to hundreds of meters. The prediction of the fracture "plumbing" in a fractured reservoir is critical to selecting and designing efficient recovery processes.This scale of fracturing is largely below the threshold resolution of seismic tools. Moreover, well tests, wellbore imagery and core only provide data on the fracture network at or within a few tens of meters of the wellbore. Thus, the fractures and the networks they form away from the wellbore may remain highly uncertain and make it harder to design more efficient recovery schemes. Keywords: breakthrough, corridor, reservoir characterization, orientation, spe isrm 78248, reservoir unit, injector, fracture orientation, upstream oil & gas, fracture Subjects: Reservoir Characterization, Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs, Exploration, development, structural geology, Naturally-fractured reservoirs This content is only available via PDF. 2002. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,298
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,593

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,189
Écart entre enseignants0,180 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→Travaux en français237 207→