MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4250205490 · doi:10.1353/plo.2016.0110

Mr. Sears

2016· article· en· W4250205490 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emily Fox Gordon

Notice bibliographique

RevuePloughshares · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueThemes in Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSilenceGirlAlleyHistorySummer vacationPsychologyArtLawAestheticsArchaeologyDevelopmental psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Mr. Sears Emily Fox Gordon (bio) Childhood is self-enclosed and timeless. In adolescence, a moment comes when we sense the future, if only vaguely and ecstatically. For me, that happened on a boarding school trip to Quebec. It was 1962 and I was fourteen. The circumstances of the excursion have gotten fuzzy in my memory, but I do know we traveled by school bus, and that a loudmouth named Warren played “Ape Call” (Nervous Norvus, 1956) over and over on one of those portable record players built into small suitcases. I recall that we stayed at the Château Frontenac, but I don’t think that can be right. We probably only saw the Frontenac. My three Buxton roommates and I were crowded into a small room. There was a lot of giggling, as you might expect, but also some serious talk late at night after the most powerful girl among us had fallen asleep and we no longer needed to fear her ridicule. On that trip I got a little more respect than usual from the others, probably because they could see that I was under the protection of the French teacher, who’d been counseling me informally over the past year. We’d been meeting once a week for half an hour after French class was dismissed. Our sessions consisted mostly of talk from me and receptive silence from Mr. Sears. The school was (and, fifty years later, continues to be) progressive, so I imagine that some committee assigned me to him for remediation of social backwardness and a tendency to skip out on classes. At the time, I thought he did it out of fondness, and he was fond of me, I still feel sure, though his affection was inflected by more detachment and amusement than I was yet able to understand. I remember nothing of the content of our talks, but I’ll never forget how flattered I was by his grave attentiveness. Once, when some girls snickered at my new hat, he drew me aside and told me he found it fetching. Mr. Sears was the second of four “male mother” figures to whom I became attached between the ages of twelve and twenty-two. He was lanky and tall and made me think of Aristide Bruant, Toulouse-Lautrec’s stylish cabaret performer, the one with the red scarf flung around his neck. Mr. Sears had a similarly fine three-quarters profile, [End Page 53] but he was elderly and far from raffish. Instead, he was slow-moving, deliberate, and dignified, a constant smoker with a much imitated habit of clearing his throat in the middle of a sentence. I repaid his kindness to me by developing a devoted nonsexual crush on him, though that was challenged three times: first when I caught sight of his upper molars, again when it got back to me that he’d expressed skepticism about my claim that I was sick and should be excused from math class (“Emily is not delicate,” the student representative who sat in on faculty meetings reported him to have said, “she is—cough cough—robusta”), and finally on the Quebec trip, when he spoke abruptly to me in the hotel breakfast room. I approached him at a far table where he was having a word with two sheepish-looking boys and asked him how to say “the bathroom” in French. I knew quite well that “salle de bain” was the textbook phrase, but worried that it sounded too formal for Quebec. I’d also forgotten that we were expected to speak French at all times. He turned to me and snapped, “les toilettes,” then went back to his questioning of the boys. In those days, I was absurdly thin-skinned, but also resilient. By the time my roommates and I stole out of the hotel that evening at dusk, the sting of the hurt had abated, leaving me in the kind of dilated state that makes everything seem sad, but beautifully so. It was late fall, and chilly. The narrow waterfront streets were pocked with icy puddles reflecting the pink and blue sky. Behind and above us brooded the Chateau Frontenac. Ahead...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,752
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0260,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,225
Écart entre enseignants0,200 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePloughsharesMême sujetThemes in Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207