Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This issue contains the second set of 10 articles arising from the Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan, a companion to the 12 articles which were published earlier in this journal (AEHMS, 2016).Hamilton Harbour (Figure 1) is a chronically eutrophic embayment located at the western end of Lake Ontario that has experienced many decades of agricultural, industrial and urban contamination. The harbour has been identified as one of the 43 Areas of Concern in 1987 under the terms of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement between Canada and the United States (IJC, 1987). This classification required the development and implementation of a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) which has been thoroughly described by Hall et al. (2006). The Hamilton Harbour RAP serves as a unique example for integrating science, public input and management practices (Hall and O'Connor, 2016).The two special issues were organized by a committee of senior experts (J. Hall, D. Boyd, M. Koops, C. Marvin and K. Minns) with long-term experience with Hamilton Harbour and its watershed. The Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management Society (AEHMS) actively co-sponsored the organization and development of the two special issues. The first call for papers for this special issue was made in the summer of 2014, inviting abstracts from potential contributors. After initial screening, an author's workshop was convened in the fall of 2014 where contributors were asked to make a 15 minute presentation highlighting the content of their proposal. Selected papers were invited for submission by the spring of 2015. Subsequently, these manuscripts were subjected to standard peer review, author's revisions and technical-linguistic editing by the AEHMS.This second special issue on Hamilton Harbour contains 10 articles which have been arranged under two broad categories, namely Biotic Ecology and Ecosystem Management. The first section provides new and detailed information about various trophic levels including microbial communities, phytoplankton, zooplankton and fish. The second section focuses on diverse management aspects dealing with beaches, terns, and sediment quality. One of the articles explores the impact of Randle Reef sediment remediation on the recovery of Hamilton harbour.The support of the Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan Office is sincerely acknowledged. Special thanks are due to John Hall, with best wishes for his retirement, and also to Kristin O'Connor. We also thank the expert committee for their advice concerning the development of this special issue. We are grateful to Rimi Kalinuaskas and Kristin Geater of Environment Canada for the financial support of this publication. The assistance of Jennifer Lorimer, Susan Blunt, Lisa Elder, Robin Rozon and Mark Fitzpatrick in the development of this issue is gratefully acknowledged.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,017 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,359 | 0,235 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».