MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W425053443

Wringing Rights out of the Mountains: Colorado's Centennial Constitution and the Ambivalent Promise of Human Rights and Social Equality

2006· article· en· W425053443 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tom I. Romero

Notice bibliographique

RevueeYLS (Yale Law School) · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLawSupreme courtCompromiseConstitutionPolitical sciencePopulationState (computer science)JurisprudencePresidential systemSociologyPolitics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

On February 28, 1861, United States Congress created Territory of Colorado. (1) As one of last states to be organized into a territory prior to Civil War, (2) Colorado's petition for statehood would play an instrumental role in bringing Civil War and its Reconstruction era of hostilities to a psychological end. (3) Recognizing 1876 national presidential election between Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel Tilden would be close, national Republican leaders pushed through a proposal for Colorado statehood in 1875. (4) Critically, without Colorado's three electoral votes, Republican Rutherford B. Hayes may not have become President of United States. (5) Severely weakened by election controversy, Hayes and Republican leaders negotiated Compromise of 1877. (6) The Compromise, which removed remaining federal soldiers stationed in South, ensured promise of equal rights and legal protections found in recent amendments to Federal Constitution on behalf of nation's Southern black citizenry would be drastically restricted and largely ignored. (7) During this formidable period, Coloradans, like their national counterparts, were deeply divided along regional lines. In rural southern expanses of territory lived a Catholic, Spanish-speaking population, while Anglo migrants from states such as Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Missouri and countries of Canada, Ireland, and Germany settled in urban and increasingly industrial sectors in northern half of state. (8) The tone of this regional split was reflected in state's territorial jurisprudence. In 1868, for instance, Territorial Supreme Court of Colorado objected to use of Spanish in Territory's courtrooms. (9) According to court, the Spanish language ... is not to be tolerated in this country. (10) The court accordingly expressed shock that judicial proceedings should be in any other than adopted language of nation. (11) Mirroring some of detente of national sectional struggle and prominent role played by Colorado's Spanish-speaking citizenry in formation of its state constitution, (12) however, Colorado Supreme Court in 1879 limited holding of 1868 case solely to use of English in pleadings. (13) It should come as no surprise this same ambivalence about human rights concerns of its diverse citizenry would become embedded in both political construction and jurisprudential development of Colorado's Centennial Constitution. Accepted by voters of Colorado on July 1, 1876, (14) state constitution has expressed over time both boundless promise and deep discord of an age immensely concerned about individual freedom and social equity. The document's Article II contains most explicit declarations of basic equality guarantees held by state's citizenry. (15) Given constitution's creation in years after Civil War, it is notable Equal Protection Clause of Fourteenth Amendment and Fifteenth Amendment to Federal Constitution do not have a counterpart in state's text. Nonetheless, Colorado framers were animated by Populist demand for human rights. (16) The original 1876 Constitution thus includes freedom of elections, (17) equality of justice, (18) due process of law, (19) prohibition against slavery, (20) and property rights of aliens (21) guarantees. In addition, original constitution explicitly provided publication of laws be printed in Spanish and German (22) and right of suffrage could be extended by state legislature to women of lawful age. (23) Perhaps no issue was as contentious, or as representative of ambivalent meaning of social equity, than issue of women's suffrage. First advocated by Territorial Governor Edward McCook and his wife in 1870, (24) movement to extend suffrage to women in Colorado gained momentum after U. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,441
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,877

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0200,016
Communication savante0,0110,003
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,267 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueeYLS (Yale Law School)→Même sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics→Travaux en français237 207→