Evaluation of sheep genetic resources in North America: Ewe productivity of purebred, crossbred and synthetic populations
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Ewe productivity from divergent genetic types of established purebreds e.g., Dorset (D), Lincoln (L), Rambouillet (Ra), Suffolk (Su) and Targhee (T); fecund-type breeds e.g., Finnsheep (F) and Romanov (Ro) breeds, and their reciprocal crosses; the Outaouais (O) and Rideau (R) Arcott breeds and their reciprocal crosses; and Synthetic I (½ F, ½ L), Synthetic II (½ D, ½ Ra) and Synthetic III (¼ F, ¼ L, ¼ D, ¼ Ra) populations were evaluated. Prolificacy, fecundity, ewe weight, grease fleece weight, wool grade, lamb survival and total lamb weights at birth, 30 d and 140 d per ewe lambing were considered jointly as a measure of ewe productivity. In general, fecund-type breed cross and Arcott breed cross were highest in productivity, the fecund-type breed, Arcott breed and synthetic populations were intermediate, in contrast the established breeds was lowest. Regardless of significantly heavier ewe and grease fleece weights, and superior wool grade of the established breeds, their poor performance can be attributed to lower prolificacy, fecundity and total lamb weights (P < 0.05). Within established breeds, the D, L, Ra and T breeds were comparable in productivity to the Su breed, but lower than the F breed (P < 0.05). The Ro breed surpassed the F breed because of significantly higher prolificacy and fecundity, and heavier ewe weight and total lamb weights, while grease fleece weight and wool grade were inconsistent. The F and Ro breeds were comparable to the Su breed despite significantly higher prolificacy and fecundity, in contrast to lighter ewe and grease fleece weights, lower wool grade, lamb survival, similar total lamb weights. Although the R breed produced significantly heavier grease fleece weight and total lamb weights than the O breed, both breeds were similar to the Su breed despite their significantly higher prolificacy and fecundity, in contrast to similar ewe weight, wool grade, lamb survival and total lamb weights, and lighter grease fleece weight. The O and R breeds were more productive than the F breed as a result of significantly heavier ewe weight, superior wool grade, higher lamb survival and heavier total lamb weights, despite their similar prolificacy, fecundity and grease fleece weight. Synthetic I and Synthetic III with Finnsheep lineage surpassed Synthetic II in productivity as a result of significantly higher prolificacy and fecundity, and heavier total lamb weights, despite similar ewe and grease fleece weights and inconsistent wool grade and lamb survival. At the same time, Synthetic I and Synthetic III were not only similar to the Su breed, but surpassed the F breed, whereas Synthetic II was similar to the Su breed and lower than the F breed. Finally, systematic crossbreeding and composite population of complementary fecund-type and established breeds achieved increased productivity from additive genetic variation and heterosis. Key words: Reproductive performance, ewe and grease fleece weights, total lamb weights, Arcotts, Finnsheep, Romanov, synthetic populations, established breeds
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».