Notice bibliographique
Résumé
06–451Baquedano-López, Patricia (U California, Berkeley, USA; pbl@berkeley.edu ), Jorge L. Solís & Shlomy Kattan, Adaptation: The language of classroom learning. Linguistics and Education (Elsevier) 16.1 (2005), 1–26. 06–452Brooks, Patricia, J. (City U New York, USA; pbrooks@mail.csi.cuny.edu ), Vera Kempe & Ariel Sionov, The role of learner and input variables in learning inflectional morphology. Applied Psycholinguistics (Cambridge University Press) 27.2 (2006), 185–209. 06–453Clahsen, Harald & Claudia Felser (U Essex, UK; harald@essex.ac.uk ), Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics (Cambridge University Press) 27.1 (2006), 3–42. 06–454Cleland, Alexandra A. (U York, UK; a.cleland@psych.york.ac.uk ) & Martin J. Pickering, Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations?Journal of Memory and Language (Elsevier) 54.2 (2006), 185–198. 06–455Devescovi, Antonella (U Rome, Italy; antonella.devescovi@uniroma1.it ), Maria Cristina Caselli, Daniela Marchione, Patrizio Pasqualetti, Judy Reilly & Elisabeth Bates, A cross-linguistic study of the relationship between grammar and lexical development. Journal of Child Language (Cambridge University Press) 32.4 (2005), 759–786. 06–456Fomin, Maxim & Gregory Toner (U Ulster, UK; gj.toner@ulster.ac.uk ), Digitizing a dictionary of Medieval Irish: The eDIL Project. Literary and Linguistic Computing (Oxford University Press) 21.1 (2006), 83–90. 06–457Geeslin, Kimberly L. (Indiana U, USA; kgeeslin@indiana.edu ) & Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes, Second language acquisition of variable structures in Spanish by Portuguese speakers. Language Learning (Blackwell) 56.1 (2006), 53–107. 06–458Gullberg, Marianne (Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, the Netherlands; marianne.gullberg@mpi.nl ), Handling discourse: Gestures, reference tracking, and communication strategies in early L2. Language Learning (Blackwell) 56.1 (2006), 155–196. 06–459Hickmann, Maya (U René Descartes Paris 5, France) & Henriette Hendriks, Static and dynamic location in French and in English. First Language (Sage) 26.1 (2006), 103–135. 06–460Hohlfeld, Annette (U Complutense, Spain; ahohlfeld@isciii.es ), Accessing grammatical gender in German: The impact of gender-marking regularities. Applied Psycholinguistics (Cambridge University Press) 27.2 (2006), 127–142. 06–461Howard, Martin (U College, Cork, Ireland; mhoward@french.ucc.ie ), Isabelle Lemée & Vera Regan, The L2 acquisition of a phonological variable: The case of /l/deletion in French. Journal of French Language Studies (Cambridge University Press) 16.1 (2006), 1–24. 06–462Huong, Le Pham Hoai (Hue U of Foreign Languages, Vietnam; quangandhuong@yahoo.com ), Learning vocabulary in group work in Vietnam. RELC Journal (Sage) 37.1 (2006), 105–121. 06–463Jie, Li (Chinese U Hong Kong, China; lijie@cuhk.edu.hk ) & Qin Xiaoqing, Language learning styles and learning strategies of tertiary-level English learners in China. RELC Journal (Sage) 37.1 (2006), 67–90. 06–464Kiefer, Kate (Colorado State U, USA; Kate.Kiefer@colostate.edu ), Complexity, class dynamics, and distance learning. Computers and Composition (Elsevier) 23.1 (2006), 125–138. 06–465Kondo-Brown, Kimi (U Hawaii at Manoa, USA; kondo@hawaii.edu ), How do English L1 learners of advanced Japanese infer unknownKanjiwords in authentic texts?Language Learning (Blackwell) 56.1 (2006), 109–153. 06–466Leonard, Lawrence B. (Purdue U, USA; xdxl@purdue.edu ), Anita M.-Y. Wong, Patricia Deevy, Stephanie F. Stokes & Paul Fletcher, The production of passives by children with specific language impairment: Acquiring English or Cantonese. Applied Psycholinguistics (Cambridge University Press) 27.2 (2006), 267–299. 06–467Leong, Che Kan (U Saskatchewan, Canada; leong@sask.usask.ca ), Kit Tai Hau, Pui Wan Cheng & Li Hai Tan, Exploring two-wave reciprocal-structural relations among orthographic knowledge, phonological sensitivity, and reading and spelling of English words by Chinese students. Journal of Educational Psychology (American Psychological Association) 97.4 (2005), 591–600. 06–468Macizo, Pedro & M. Teresa Bajo (U Granada, Spain; mbajo@ugr.es ), Reading for repetition and reading for translation: Do they involve the same processes?Cognition (Elsevier) 99.1 (2006), 1–34. 06–469Mackay, Ian R. & James E. Fleger (U Alabama, USA; jeflege@uab.edu ) & Satomi Imai, Evaluating the effects of chronological age and sentence duration on degree of perceived foreign accent. Applied Psycholinguistics (Cambridge University Press) 27.2 (2006), 157–183. 06–470Pavlik Jr., Philip I. & John R. Anderson (Carnegie Mellon U, USA), Practice and forgetting effects on vocabulary memory: An activationbased model of the spacing effect. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal (Lawrence Erlbaum) 29.4 (2005), 559–586. 06–471Ram, Frost (Hebrew U, Israel; frost@mscc.huji.ac.il ), Tamar Kugler, Avital Deutsch & Kenneth I. Foster, Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition (American Psychological Association) 31.6 (2005), 1293–1396. 06–472Roberts, Theresa, A. (California State U, USA; robertst@csus.edu ), Articulation accuracy and vocabulary size contributions to phonemic awareness and word reading in English language learners. Journal of Educational Psychology (American Psychological Association) 97.4 (2005), 601–616. 06–473Treiman, Rebecca (Washington U, USA; rtreiman@wustl.edu ), Brett Kessler & Tatiana Cury Pollo, Learning about the letter name subset of the vocabulary: Evidence from US and Brazilian pre-schoolers. Applied Psycholinguistics (Cambridge University Press) 27.2 (2006), 211–227. 06–474Vandergrift, Larry (U Ottawa, Canada; lvdgrift@uottawa.ca ), Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency?The Modern Language Journal (Blackwell) 90.1 (2006), 6–18.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,310 | 0,194 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».