MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4250882815 · doi:10.1353/pnm.2013.0018

Conceiving Musical Photorealism: An Interview with Richard Beaudoin

2013· article· en· W4250882815 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePerspectives of New Music · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueMusic Technology and Sound Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMusicalArtComposition (language)NotationPeriod (music)Art historyHistoryLiteraturePhilosophyLinguisticsAesthetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

CONCEIVING MUSICAL PHOTOREALISM: AN INTERVIEW WITH RICHARD BEAUDOIN DANICK TROTTIER N LATE JULY 2009, while spending a summer living in Montréal, Richard Beaudoin was absorbed in the process of using microtiming data as material for composition. Though we had been colleagues since our simultaneous arrival at Harvard University in September 2008, I had never seen him so excited; something seemed to be changing his way of composing. The composition of his Études d'un prélude was reaching its first jalons, each piece opening out into the next one. The point of origin was a lecture that Dr. Olivier Senn gave at Harvard in February 2009. Senn was presenting the Lucerne Audio Recording Analyzer [LARA], developed with his colleagues from the Institut Forschung & Entwicklung at the Hochschule Luzern in Switzerland. I Conceiving Musical Photorealism 175 Senn had made micromeasurements of an iconic recording, offering a dissection of how a performance is built via the rhythm and sound energy of every attack.1 The recording that they measured was Martha Argerich’s performance of Chopin’s Prélude in E minor, Op. 28 no. 4, recorded in Munich on October 22–25, 1975, and released by Deutsche Grammophon as DG 415 836-2. Beginning in April 2009, Beaudoin translated these micromeasurements back into standard notation, and began using this material as the basis for a series of works for diverse instrumentations, called Études d’un prélude [Studies of a prelude]; twelve works in this series were completed in 2009–10.2 From our encounter in Montréal sprang the idea to hold interviews about the compositional project and the issues surrounding it. Two sessions took place at Harvard: the first was in January 2010, covering the new works with Beaudoin at the piano; the second was in April 2010, covering the aesthetic issues implied by this new way of working. A final exchange took place in June 2011, just after Beaudoin returned from a stay in London supervising recordings of eleven works based on microtimings of Argerich playing Chopin, Pollini playing Webern, and Cortot playing Debussy. The resulting interview records the earliest stages of the so-called ‘photorealism’ process—an application of micromeasurements as compositional material. The interview is organized into five parts: (1) Beaudoin’s trajectory, (2) LARA and the foundations of microtiming, (3) the Études d'un prélude series, (4) links to the cantus firmus tradition, and (5) science, aesthetics, and the future of ‘photorealism.’ TOWARDS THE ÉTUDES D’UN PRÉLUDE (2009) TROTTIER: What I want to establish at the beginning of this interview is a sense of your trajectory (borrowing Boulez’s concept). For example, on the recent CD, Backwards Glance by the pianist Constantine Finehouse, we find two pieces by Brahms alongside two of yours: Qui Tollis (2004) and Les signes de ma faiblesse (2006). Your pieces work as a mirror of the past using numerous allusions and quotations. In fact, regarding what you have done since then, Qui Tollis seems somehow prophetic. As I understand it, it’s a reflection on the way you can ask questions of the musical past. Am I right to say that? BEAUDOIN: I think the issue of ‘questions’ has always been with me. I was inspired in Qui Tollis by a little question-filled poem by Neruda, which included lines like: “Dónde está el niño que yo fui, sigue adentro de mí o se fue? . . . Por qué anduvimos tanto tiempo creciendo 176 Perspectives of New Music para separarnos?” [Where was the child I once was—inside me still—or gone? . . . Why did we spend so much time growing up, only to grow apart?] (Neruda 1994). My composition does include some borrowed material, but it’s not acknowledged. In both of those works the borrowing is structural, in the sense of being underground. The reason I don’t talk about the sources in those pieces is simply because I want each piece to articulate itself on its own terms. TROTTIER: Since we opened the door on your relationship to the past, I’ll bring up the fact that the past seems to nurture your language and your expression. This shadowy presence of the tradition through...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,574
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,588

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,257
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle