MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4250988408 · doi:10.5325/weslmethstud.8.1.0080

Review

2015· article· en· W4250988408 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueWesley and Methodist Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMormonism, Religion, and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMethodismContext (archaeology)HistorySpanish Civil WarArtEnvironmental ethicsReligious studiesArchaeologyPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In tracing the development of Methodist open air preaching in America, Russell Richey covers some ground already trodden in some of his previous books, notably Early American Methodism (1991). However in this new work, the backdrop of forests and glades is examined not just as location but as an agent for identity formation and a potential resource for theological reflection, albeit one that that Richey laments is under-utilized by both nineteenth-century pioneers and twentieth-century denominational consolidators.Richey begins by looking at Wesley's own practice of outdoor preaching before examining the adaptation of the resulting Methodist discipline for the American context. Some fascinating accounts follow from early American itinerants, and from these, Richey posits the idea of woodland as preaching place being tamed into ‘cathedral’ (shady grove) and resorted to for confession (garden).He then traces the augmentation of quarterly meetings by the introduction of camp meetings at the turn of the nineteenth century. Gathering in forest clearings, it was often possible, as in few places else, for racial mixing to take place, and Richey gives absorbing insights into many roles camp meetings played in the antebellum period in the divisions of American Methodism over issues of slavery and the treatment of Native Americans, as well as the development of institutional ecclesiology, all of which led to the emergence of rival Methodisms organizing their own outdoor gatherings.Following the Civil War, camp meetings and their settings became domesticated in a number of ways. Martha's Vineyard camp meeting had begun in 1835, but by the 1860s it developed into Wesleyan Grove, a permanent camp ground that Richey describes as a vocation-friendly ‘heavenly home, a resting place, a religious colony’ (160). Both in the rise of The National Camp Meeting Association for the Promotion of Holiness and in the Chautauqua education programme meetings, the emphasis became focused not on the conversion of those outside the faith but the improvement of those within it, either through entire sanctification or more instruction. Here, Richey claims, the taming of the great outdoors into permanent camp grounds consolidated a growing division between evangelical and liberal approaches to Christian discipleship which continues in the United Methodist Church and elsewhere today.Richey's book is a thoroughly absorbing and welcome exploration of a subject which, as he himself acknowledges, has been comparatively under-recorded or analysed since Charles A. Johnson's The Frontier Camp Meeting: Religion's Harvest Time in 1955. Most of the minor criticisms I have of Richey's book arise from being a British reader. It would have been very useful to have had the inclusion of a map and illustrations, particularly in the treatment of the establishment of permanent camp grounds toward the end of the book. A separate bibliography would have been invaluable, too, in order to follow up more easily on Richey's many sources. Also, James M. Buckley, whose A History of Methodists in the United States Richey refers to, does not attribute the origin of the British connexion which became established in the United States in 1840 as ‘Lorenzo Dow's Primitive Methodists’ (171), even though Buckley does repeatedly get William Clowes's name wrong!Perhaps Richey's most original claim is that early American Methodism missed an opportunity in not reflecting upon its sylvan ministry to develop a lived Wesleyan creation theology. Here it would have been helpful to have had contemporaneous examples from other traditions to avoid reading back from a twenty-first-century perspective what such theologizing might have looked like in the service of itinerant evangelistic ministry in the early nineteenth century. If Richey's appendix, giving entries of ‘John Wesley Preaching under Trees and in Groves’ from his Journal, is anything to go by, there is little indication that the British countryside impacted much upon Wesley's theological understanding of his preaching ministry as he documented it. In this outlook at least, his earliest American preachers seem to have followed his lead without adaptation.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,313
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,356

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,269
Tête enseignante GPT0,364
Écart entre enseignants0,095 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle