Visualization of Interfacial Interactions of Crude Oil-CO2 Systems under Reservoir Conditions
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Visualization of Interfacial Interactions of Crude Oil-CO2 Systems under Reservoir Conditions Daoyong Yang; Daoyong Yang University of Regina Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Yongan Gu Yongan Gu University of Regina Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, April 2004. Paper Number: SPE-89366-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/89366-MS Published: April 17 2004 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Yang, Daoyong, and Yongan Gu. "Visualization of Interfacial Interactions of Crude Oil-CO2 Systems under Reservoir Conditions." Paper presented at the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, April 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/89366-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference Search Advanced Search AbstractIn this paper, an experimental technique is developed to study the interfacial interactions of the crude oil-CO2 systems under reservoir conditions. By using the axisymmetric drop shape analysis (ADSA) for the pendant drop case, this new technique makes it possible to measure the interfacial tension (IFT) and to visualize the interfacial interactions between crude oil and CO2 at high pressures and elevated temperatures. The major component of this experimental set-up is a see-through windowed high-pressure cell. A number of important physical phenomena have been observed when the crude oil is made in contact with CO2. They include oil swelling, light-ends extraction, initial turbulent mixing, skin layer, oil drop movement, wettability alteration, asphaltene precipitation, and bubbling at the crude oil-CO2 interface. In particular, the light-ends extraction, initial turbulent mixing and wettability alteration are the major characteristics of the CO2 flooding processes. It is also found that there always exists a constant low equilibrium IFT as long as the pressure is higher than a threshold value. No ultra low or zero IFT between crude oil and CO2 is found, regardless of the operating pressures and temperatures. Therefore, the measured constant low IFT and the observed interfacial interactions show that only partial miscibility between crude oil and CO2 can be achieved for most reservoirs. In addition, it is anticipated that wettability alteration may have significant effects on the ultimate oil recovery and CO2 sequestration.IntroductionCO2 flooding is considered as one of the most promising enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques because it not only efficiently enhances oil recovery but also considerably reduces greenhouse gas emissions. In the past five decades, there have been extensive laboratory studies and field applications of CO2 EOR processes. It has been found that these processes can enhance oil recovery normally by up to 8–16% of the original oil in place1,2. In the CO2 flooding processes, saturation distribution and flow behavior of crude oil, gas and brine are controlled mainly by the interfacial interactions among crude oil, reservoir brine, CO2 and reservoir rocks. These interfacial interactions include the interfacial tension (IFT), wettability, capillarity and dispersion. Wettability, capillary pressure and dispersion can be closely related to the IFT under certain conditions of pressure, temperature and compositions3–5. Therefore, it is essential that the interfacial interactions of the crude oil-CO2 systems be accurately described under reservoir conditions.In general, it is found that oil viscosity reduction, oil swelling effect and miscibility between crude oil and CO2 mainly contribute to the ultimate oil recovery in the CO2 flooding processes6,7. Both the oil viscosity reduction and the oil swelling effect lead to mobility improvement, while the miscibility between crude oil and CO2 improves the sweep efficiency. At present, the oil viscosity reduction and the oil swelling effect can be accurately quantified under reservoir conditions8,9. Usually, CO2 is not miscible at first contact with crude oils but may reach the dynamic miscibility through multiple contacts7,10. Miscibility between crude oil and CO2 can be determined by conducting the slim tube test6,7,10 and the rising bubble apparatus test11 as well as using some empirical correlations12. The minimum miscible pressure (MMP) is used to indicate whether there exists miscibility between crude oil and CO2 at a given pressure. In addition, zero IFT can be used to characterize the so-called complete miscibility because there is no interface between the two phases of interest under the miscible condition13–15. Keywords: co 2, miscibility, crude oil, extraction, interfacial interaction, enhanced recovery, upstream oil & gas, sequential digital image, digital image, pendant drop case Subjects: Improved and Enhanced Recovery, Chemical flooding methods This content is only available via PDF. 2004. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».