Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: In the late 1960's and 1970's, pulmonary hemorrhage (PH) occurred mainly in full term infants with severe pre-existing illness. The incidence of PH was quoted as 1.3 per 1,000 live births. In the older medical literature, the risk factors associated with PH included the severity of the associated illness, intrauterine growth restriction, patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), coagulopathy, and the need for assisted ventilation. Presently, PH occurs mainly in preterm ventilated infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) who often have a PDA and have received surfactant. Currently, PH complicates the hospital course of 3-5% of preterm infants with RDS. Although not clear, the cause of PH is thought to be due to a rapid lowering of intrapulmonary pressure, which facilitates left to right shunting across a patent ductus arteriosus and an increase in pulmonary blood flow. Retrospective case reports and one prospective uncontrolled study that used surfactant for PH in neonates have shown promising results in treating PH. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of surfactant treatment compared to placebo or no intervention on mortality in neonates with pulmonary hemorrhage. In addition, the review will evaluate the effect of surfactant treatment on neonatal morbidities associated with PH compared to placebo or no intervention. SEARCH STRATEGY: The following databases were searched in January 2008: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2007) and MEDLINE from 1966 and EMBASE from 1980 to the time of the full review using the OVID interface. The proceedings of the Annual Meetings of the Pediatric Academic Societies and the European Society of Pediatric Research published in Pediatric Research or electronically on their web sites were searched from 1994 to the time of the full review. Science citation index (Web of Science) was searched for authors quoting key references of observational studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that evaluated the effect of surfactant in the treatment of PH in intubated term or preterm (< 37 weeks) neonates with PH. Infants were included up to 44 weeks postmenstrual age. Infants were included regardless of prior treatment with surfactant. The interventions studied were intratracheal instillation of surfactant (natural or synthetic, regardless of dose) vs. placebo or no intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: If studies were identified by the literature search, the planned analyses included calculation of the relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD), number needed to treat (NNT) or number needed to harm (NNH) for dichotomous outcomes, and weighed mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes, with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). A fixed effects model would be used for meta-analyses. Heterogeneity tests, including the I- squared (I(2)) statistic, would be performed to assess the appropriateness of pooling the data and the results would be reported. MAIN RESULTS: No trials were identified. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No randomized or quasi-randomized trials that evaluated the effect of surfactant in PH were identified. Therefore, no conclusions from such trials can be drawn. In view of the promising results from studies with less strict study designs than a randomized controlled trial, there is reason to conduct further trials of surfactant for the treatment of PH in neonates.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».