Unlearning Eugenics: Sexuality, Reproduction, and Disability in Post-Nazi Europe by Dagmar Herzog
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Unlearning Eugenics: Sexuality, Reproduction, and Disability in Post-Nazi Europe by Dagmar Herzog Jane Freeland Herzog, Dagmar – Unlearning Eugenics: Sexuality, Reproduction, and Disability in Post-Nazi Europe. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2018. Pp. 171. Building on her previous work on sexuality in twentieth-century Europe, Dagmar Herzog's new book, Unlearning Eugenics, further explores the ambivalent impact and meaning of the sexual revolution. In an impressive study that spans the period from the Third Reich to the present day, Herzog examines the intersections of disability and reproductive rights activism and eugenic thinking in post-1945 Europe. The book reveals the long-standing connection between debates about abortion and changing attitudes towards disability in European society. Specifically, Herzog historicizes political strategies currently used by abortion opponents who [End Page 698] justify the limitation of women's rights on the basis of "justice for the physically and cognitively disabled" (p. 3). In doing so, she shows how "unreflected insensitivities" regarding disability—employed on both sides of the abortion debate—have "come to haunt the abortion politics of the twenty-first century" (p. 9). As Herzog rightly points out, such political rhetoric carries even greater weight given the history of eugenics in Europe, embodied mostly violently in the Holocaust and the Nazi T4 euthanasia program. Consisting of only three chapters and an introduction, the book adopts a "lecture format" (indeed, the book is based on a lecture series Herzog gave at Hebrew University in Jerusalem in 2016). Employing this style, Herzog's writing and argument are purposefully broad, with much of the historiographical and evidentiary discussion appearing not in the text, but in the extensive footnote section. While this structure may disappoint readers looking for a typical historical monograph, it allows Herzog to present a complex and intellectually challenging history in a much more accessible manner. Rather than providing definitive conclusions, Unlearning Eugenics instead offers the reader questions. What are the costs, meanings, and consequences of the liberal value change Europe experienced in the second half of the twentieth century? How have the rights of different marginalized groups been played off against each other? And what do contemporary political developments tell us about how the lessons of history have been learned? At its core, then, the book is a call to re-evaluate historically the success of European liberalism. The first chapter examines "previously neglected aspects" of the debates surrounding abortion in Western Europe in the 1960s and 1970s, revealing how they have come to haunt contemporary reproductive rights in Europe (p. 16). In particular, Herzog challenges many of the common assumptions surrounding abortion. By historicizing abortion reform within a longer history of contraception and eugenic thinking, Herzog shows how early opposition to decriminalization was not so much about the protection of life (a much more recent phenomenon), but rather reflected long-standing anxieties about contraception and declining European birth rates. Moreover, Herzog emphasizes the importance of limiting widespread illegal abortion to the successful decriminalization of abortion throughout Western Europe in the 1970s. From this perspective, abortion reform becomes less of a success story for women's rights and seemingly more of an attempt to bring women's reproductive power under the control of the state once more. But the focus of the chapter is on disability and the striking continuities in eugenic thinking and argumentation across Europe even after the defeat of Nazism in 1945. As Herzog shows, feminist, legal and medical arguments in favour of liberalizing access to abortion often emphasized the importance of preventing the birth of disabled children, alongside other eugenic concerns, including fears of overpopulation in the developing world and among Europe's working classes. The legacy of this eugenic thinking has now been challenged by disability rights advocates. But it has also been appropriated by right-wing politicians and NGOs, who are rhetorically instrumentalizing disability rights in the service of promoting a sexually conservative agenda. Importantly, Herzog shows both how this has [End Page 699] shaped European politics and what this has meant for parents and their ability to self-determine the shape of their family. Indeed, Herzog is sensitive to how this new political landscape has complicated the ability to support and...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».