MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4251505874 · doi:10.1177/120347540000400101

Editorial

2000· editorial· en· W4251505874 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Daniel N. Sauder

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2000
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLeprosy Research and Treatment
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineXeroderma pigmentosumDermatologyVemurafenibRetinoic acidCancerLeprosyCancer researchImmunologyDNA repairInternal medicineGeneticsBiologyGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The cosmopolitan nature of current travel practices, as well as significant immigration from endemic areas, has led to increases in the incidence of leprosy. The classic presentation of leprosy usually appears as the indeterminate form, demonstrates hypopigmented macules with a loss of sensation. However, the manifestations can sometimes be quite protean. Sadeghi et al. review the rheumatic manifestations of leprosy with an illustrating case presenting with arthritis. Rheumatic symptoms are common in leprosy patients and may be the presenting manifestations and should be considered in patients with persistent rash and unusual arthritis who have a history of exposure to endemic areas. Significant interest has developed over the past decade in inhibiting cutaneous carcinogenesis with retinoic acid. This has been used as an effective therapy in certain genetically predisposed individuals, including individuals with a DNA repair defect in xeroderma pigmentosa. The molecular mechanisms of retinoids ability to inhibit ultraviolet light induced carcinogenesis have not been determined. Li and co-workers have examined the effect of retinoic acid on ultraviolet light induced programmed cell death (apotosis) as well as expression of the tumour suppressor gene P53. Their studies suggest that retinoic acid does not work on the initiation stages of the cancer development, but may work in the promotion and progression stage. Of more immediate clinical importance, in the Point-Counterpoint section, we have two insightful articles on how physician reimbursement affects patient care. As North American health care continues to evolve, there is constant debate on what model system works best for the ultimate benefit of our patients. Physicians, politicians, and administrators are constantly comparing the United States health care delivery to that of Canada. While no one can accurately predict the future developments in these areas, I think Dr. McElgunn sums the concerns that indeed are applicable on both sides of the border: ".socialized medical system has been of great benefit to patients but the ability of its physicians to continue to carry the system is at or near the breaking point. The ramifications of the issues of access and quality of care are harbingers of a system in turmoil." While these concerns must be dealt with, strong physician input is vital to continuing the effective evolution of our health care system. A vital part of our health care delivery is the increasing use of diagnostic tests. Key treatment decisions and interventions are based on the interpretation of these tests. However, most tests are "imperfect instruments." The article by Binder and Dreiseitl concisely reviews sensitivity, specificity, prevalence, predictive values, and likelihood ratios in a highly informative manner with significant examples. This paper provides a reference with which all physicians should be familiar. Traditionally, Western medicine has focused on a model of disease whereby pathology was regarded as well defined alteration in normal physiology that should respond to appropriate pharmaceutical or surgical interventions. However, in recent years patient focused medicine has become an important aspect of our practices. The concept of health related quality of life has represented an important advance in dealing with these concerns in our treatment of disease. Drs. Price and Harding examine the concept of health related quality of life using the example of a diabetic foot ulcer complications. These types of measures are important to understand, not only in the context of this disease but in the context of any chronic dermatologic condition.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,025
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,894

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,306
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2000
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and SurgeryMême sujetLeprosy Research and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207