MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4251560328 · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4

Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences

2019· book· en· W4251560328 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Pranee Liamputtong

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typebook
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNational Drug and Alcohol Research CentreUniversity of New South WalesUniversity of TorontoCalifornia State University, NorthridgeHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of SydneyUniversità degli Studi di PalermoNational Health and Medical Research CouncilCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorCharles Sturt UniversityGeorge Mason UniversityUniversity of ManchesterUniversity of WollongongYork UniversityWestern Sydney UniversityManchester Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of PittsburghMinisterio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación ProductivaLoughborough UniversityUniversity of MelbourneUniversity of FloridaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulHelsingin YliopistoUniversidad Nacional de Lomas de ZamoraLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Mots-clésSocial researchSociologyBiomedical sciencesBehavioural sciencesManagement scienceEngineering ethicsData sciencePsychologySocial scienceComputer scienceMedicineEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Research is defined by the Australian Research Council as "the creation of new knowledge and/or the use of existing knowledge in a new and creative way so as to generate new concepts, methodologies, inventions and understandings."Research is thus the foundation for knowledge.It produces evidence and informs actions that can provide wider benefit to a society.The knowledge that researchers cultivate from a piece of research can be adopted for social and health programs that can improve the health and well-being of the individuals, their communities, and the societies in which they live.As we have witnessed, in all corners of the globe, research has become an endeavor that most of us in the health and social sciences cannot avoid.This Handbook is conceived to provide the foundation to readers who wish to embark on a research project in order to form knowledge that they need.The Handbook comprises four main parts: Traditional Research Methods in Health and Social Sciences, Innovative Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, Doing Cross-Cultural Research in Health Social Sciences, and Sensitive Research Methodology and Approach.This Handbook attests to the diversity and richness of research methods in the health and social sciences.It will benefit many readers, particularly students and researchers who undertake research in health and social science areas.It is also valuable for the training needs of postgraduate students who wish to undertake research in cross-cultural settings, with special groups of people, as it provides essential knowledge not only on the methods of data collection but also salient issues that they need to know if they wish to succeed in their research endeavors.Traditionally, there are several research approaches and practices that researchers in the health social sciences have adopted.These include qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches.Each approach has its own philosophical foundations, and the ways researchers go about to form knowledge can be different.But all approaches do share the same goal: to acquire knowledge that can benefit the world.This Handbook includes many chapters that dedicate to the traditional ways of conducting research.These chapters provide the "traditional ways of knowing" that many readers will need.As health and social science researchers, we are now living in a moment that needs our imagination and creativity when we carry out our research.Indeed, we are now living "in the new age" where we will see more and more "new experimental vii works" being invented by researchers.And in this new age, we have witnessed many innovative and creative forms of research in the health and social sciences.In this Handbook, I also bring together a unique group of health and social science researchers to present their innovative and creative research methods that readers can adopt in their own research.The Handbook introduces many new ways of doing research.It embraces "methodological diversity," and this methodological diversity will bring "new ways of knowing" in the health and social sciences.Chapters in this Handbook will help to open up our ideas about doing research differently from the orthodox research methods that we have been using or have been taught to do.Despite the increased demands on cross-cultural research, discussions on "culturally sensitive methodologies" are still largely neglected in the literature on research methods.As a result, researchers who are working in cross-cultural settings often confront many challenges with very little information on how to deal with these difficulties.Performing cross-cultural research is exciting, but it is also full of ethical and methodological challenges.This Handbook includes a number of chapters written by researchers who have undertaken their research in cross-cultural settings.They are valuable to many readers who wish to embark on doing a crosscultural research in the future.Globally too, we have witnessed many people become vulnerable to health and social issues.It will be difficult, or even impossible, for health and social science researchers to avoid carrying out research regarding vulnerable and marginalized populations within the "moral discourse" of the postmodern world, as it is likely that these population groups will be confronted with more and more problems in their private and public lives as well as in their health and well-being.Similar to undertaking cross-cultural research, the task of conducting research with the "vulnerable" and/or the "marginalized" presents researchers with unique opportunities and yet dilemmas.The Handbook also includes chapters that discuss research that involves sensitive and vulnerable/marginalized people.This Handbook cannot be born without the help of others.I would like to express my gratitude to many people who helped to make this book possible.I am grateful to all the contributors who worked very hard to get their chapter done timely and comprehensively.I hope that the process of writing your chapter has been a rewarding endeavor to you as well.My sincere appreciation is given to Mokshika Gaur who believes in the value of the volume on research methods in health social sciences and has given me a contract to edit the Handbook.I also thank Tina Shelton, Vasowati Shome, and Ilaria Walker of Springer who helped to bring this book to life.I dedicate this book to my mother Yindee Liamputtong, who has been a key person in my life.It was my mother who made it possible for me to continue my education amidst poverty.Without her, I would not have been where I am now.I also dedicate the book to my two daughters, Zoe Sanipreeya Rice and Emma Inturatana Rice, who have formed an important part of my personal and professional lives in Australia.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,042
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,069
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,042
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,223

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0420,069
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,001
Bibliométrie0,0080,009
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,006
Communication savante0,0070,006
Science ouverte0,0040,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0410,033

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,789
Tête enseignante GPT0,738
Écart entre enseignants0,051 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1 059
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsTravaux en français237 207