MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4251575076 · doi:10.2523/60690-ms

Fracturing Through Coiled Tubing - Recent Developments and Case Histories

2000· article· en· W4251575076 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
W.G. Gavin

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueOil and Gas Production Techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCitationCoiled tubingComputer scienceEngineeringLibrary sciencePetroleum engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Fracturing Through Coiled Tubing - Recent Developments and Case Histories W.G. Gavin W.G. Gavin Nowsco-Fracmaster/B.J. Services Ltd. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable, Houston, Texas, April 2000. Paper Number: SPE-60690-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/60690-MS Published: April 05 2000 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Gavin, W.G. "Fracturing Through Coiled Tubing - Recent Developments and Case Histories." Paper presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable, Houston, Texas, April 2000. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/60690-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractFracturing through coiled tubing has progressed considerably since the first job done in 1993. In southeastern Alberta large numbers of wells are being selectively fractured through coiled tubing with mechanical isolation tools. Conventional fracturing techniques may result in small lenses that have the potential to contribute to production being either bypassed, or ineffectively treated. By utilizing coiled tubing and selective fracturing, all contributing zones can be fractured and the full potential of the well realized. Up to eight zones are being treated per well.This paper will discuss work currently being undertaken with Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen energized water based fracturing fluids. A summary of work done to date and case histories will be presented. Current and future developments in isolation tools and fracturing fluids will be discussed and the issues regarding geographical technology transfer examined.The results of pumping fluids containing abrasive particulates at high pump rates through the coiled tubing are discussed with emphasis on abrasion of the pipe, fatigue and pressure limitations. Specific additional safety considerations are outlined and discussed.IntroductionAs of year end 1999 approximately 700 wells1 have been fractured industry wide using coiled tubing as a conduit. The number of zones per well varies from 1 to 8 and the total number of fracture treatments performed on these 700 wells is over 5,100. This technology has been predominantly limited to the shallow gas fields of southeastern Alberta.It is difficult to ascertain when the first coiled tubing fracture treatment took place but a job was carried out in south-eastern Alberta2 in February, 1993 where a 25 tonne treatment was pumped through 73.0 mm (2-7/8 inch) coiled tubing at 3.0 m3/ minute (18.9 bbl/min). The procedure was similar to that performed today with the exception that the coiled tubing was stung into a permanent packer.While the operational feasibility of fracturing through coiled tubing had been proven the commercial viability of the technique was still questionable and further development shelved. In 1997 the technique was refined for multi-zone fracturing3 which significantly impacted the commercial viability.The work described in this paper has been performed on gas wells and carried out with the well live. Standard practice is to fracture from the bottom zone up. Initially only one well was fractured per day (up to 8 zones) but this has progressed to two wells per day and the feasibility of three wells per day is being evaluated. Coiled tubing is an excellent medium for the operation as a rig would have to strip out of the hole with the well live. After fracturing the wells are cleaned out periodically with a shallow coiled tubing unit until sand production stops. Indications are that utilizing coiled tubing fracturing over conventional methods may halve the number of cleanouts in certain circumstances.Other driving forces for fracturing through coiled tubing are the desire to protect old (and/or corroded) casing and completion jewelry from the high pressures and potential erosion associated with the treatment.Fracture designFor the work evaluated in this study cross-linked water based fracturing fluids are predominantly used in the operation. In general, between five and twenty metric tons of sand is placed at concentrations up to 1800 kg/m3. The fluid is energized with liquid CO2 or gaseous Nitrogen to aid in flowback after the treatment. Liquid CO2 was used in over 95% of the fracture treatments reviewed. Forced closure has been used on some of the treatments, thus, requiring immediate flowback. Pump rates of between 1.2 and 2.5 m3/minute (7.55 to 15.73 bbl/min) are standard. Keywords: cup tool, hydraulic fracturing, reel, service ltd, gradient, friction gradient, fracture treatment, recent development, requirement, spe 60690 Subjects: Hydraulic Fracturing, Completion Installation and Operations, Coiled tubing operations This content is only available via PDF. 2000. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,763
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,003
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,214
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing RoundtableMême sujetOil and Gas Production TechniquesTravaux en français237 207