01 DOSE ESCALATION WITH ORIGINATOR INFLIXIMAB IS MORE COMMON THAN STANDARD DOSING IN PEDIATRIC IBD – THE DEVELOP EXPERIENCE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
DEVELOP is a multicenter, prospective, observational registry of the long-term safety and clinical status of 6070 pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD; Crohn’s disease [CD]: 4122, ulcerative colitis [UC]: 1643, and IBD-unclassified[IBD-U]: 305; median age at enrollment 13.0 years) treated with originator infliximab (REM) and/or other medical therapies for IBD as part of routine clinical care. DEVELOP has sites in the United States, Canada and the EU and enrolled patients from 2007 to 2017. The labelled maintenance dose and interval of REM for treatment of pediatric CD or UC is 5mg/kg IV every 8 weeks. Our aim was to assess how frequently providers needed to escalate this dose. Enrollment was targeted such that half of the enrolled patients had been exposed to REM at baseline. The treating physicians then continue to prescribe IBD treatments based on their usual clinical practice and standards of care. Patients are categorized into cohorts according to their prevalent or incident IBD medication exposure, including patients receiving therapy prior to enrollment and patients receiving therapy during registry follow-up. The last data cut available (June 30 2018) assessed 33,586.4 patient years (PY) of follow up. Approximately half of the registry population (47.5%) was exposed to REM prior to enrollment, with similar breakdown by IBD diagnosis (CD: 47.5%; UC: 46.4%; and IBD-U: 54.1%). An additional 20.1% (23.0% of CD patients, 14.5% of UC and 12.5% of IBD-U) were exposed on or after their baseline visit, giving a total of 67.7% of all patients in DEVELOP (Table 1). Among all patients, the median average maintenance dose of REM thus far during the registry period is 6.5 mg/kg (CD: 6.1 mg/kg, UC: 7.5 mg/kg and IBD-U: 8.0 mg/kg). The median maintenance dosing frequency was 8 weeks for CD patients, 7 weeks for UC patients and 6 weeks for IBD-U patients (Table 2). In the most recent 12-month follow up period, the median total number of REM infusions was 17.0, with a median duration of REM exposure of 32.3 months and a mean duration of 38.9 months. During the entire registry follow up period, 27.3% of patients who had been receiving REM discontinued the drug. The median interval between first dose and discontinuation was 20.9 months and the most common reasons for discontinuation were loss of efficacy (47.0% of discontinuations), adverse events (17.2%) and administration reactions (13.3%). In the international DEVELOP pediatric IBD registry, standard dosing of REM is the exception rather than the rule. The median maintenance doses used in CD, UC and IBD-U are all higher than the labelled dose of 5 mg/kg. In UC and IBD-U, the median maintenance interval is also shorter than the labelled interval of q8 weeks. Further analysis will examine clinical measures before and after dose escalation.
Conservé avec la notice de tri, où il sert de preuve aux étiquettes ci-dessus.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Le tri à trois modèles
les 5 600 travaux triés →Les trois modèles l'ont jugé hors champ.
Registry analysis of infliximab dose escalation in pediatric IBD; clinical question.
The registry study examines infliximab dosing in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.
Observational registry of infliximab dosing in pediatric IBD; clinical therapeutics.
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».