Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We appreciate Manning et al.’s comments about our article1 and the issues surrounding withholding of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEis) and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs) before noncardiac surgery. We agree that large, international, randomized trials are required to optimally inform the effects of medications in the perioperative period; however, we do not agree that there is a compelling reason to conduct separate trials for ACEi and ARB medications in the surgical setting. The authors suggest that, based on some differences in their mechanisms of action, the withholding of these medications before surgery may produce different effects on major outcomes and should be considered separately. The Vascular events In noncardiac Surgery patIents cOhort evaluatioN (VISION) Study did not differentiate between ACEi and ARB medications and cannot inform whether there was a difference in effect between these drugs.In general cardiology, the issue of whether the differences in mechanisms of action of ACEi and ARB medications results in differential clinical effects has been explored. The Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) randomized 8,576 patients to receive ramipril (an ACEi) 10 mg per day and 8,542 patients to receive telmisartan (an ARB) 80 mg per day and followed patients for a median of 56 months.2 The primary composite outcome (a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) occurred in 1,412 patients (16.5%) assigned ramipril and 1,423 patients (16.7%) assigned telmisartan (relative risk, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.09). Moreover, there was no difference across the treatment groups in any of the individual components of the composite outcome.The authors suggest that perioperative discontinuation of ACEi or ARB medications may potentially cause rebound hypertension and that this, too, may differ between these drug classes. A trial of 526 patients randomized to withhold or continue their ACEi or ARB before noncardiac surgery (approximately half of the patients were taking an ACEi and the other half an ARB) demonstrated that the withholding of these medications did not increase preoperative or postoperative hypertension.3 Although there were no separate analyses for ACEi and ARBs, we would expect at least some trend toward an increased risk of hypertension if the discontinuation of either medication produced this effect.The authors suggest that the duration for which patients have been taking an ACEi before surgery also may modify the effect of preoperative withholding because of the angiotensin escape phenomenon. We did not collect data regarding the duration of preoperative ACEi therapy; however, the escape phenomenon manifested within days to two weeks of initiating ACEi therapy.4 We believe few patients would have initiated an ACEi within days to two weeks before surgery because of prior concerns in the literature about the use of ACEi in the perioperative setting.We agree with the authors that large trials should inform the treatment effects of perioperative medications. Until such a trial occurs, we believe that—based on data from the VISION Study—physicians should consider withholding ACEi and ARB medications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.Dr. Roshanov declares no competing interests. Dr. Devereaux declares grants from Roche-Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany) and Abbott-Diagnostics (Abbott Park, Illinois) during the conduct of the study, and grants from Octopharma (Lachen, Switzerland), Philips Healthcare (Amsterdam, The Netherlands), Stryker (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada), Covidien (Minneapolis, Minnesota), and Boehringer Ingelheim (Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany) outside the submitted work.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,084 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,020 | 0,032 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,053 | 0,037 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».