Effects of Heavy-Oil/Solvent Interfacial Tension on Gravity Drainage in the Vapor Extraction (VAPEX) Process
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Effects of Heavy Oil-Solvent Interfacial Tension on Gravity Drainage in the vapor extraction (VAPEX) Process Chaodong Yang; Chaodong Yang U. of Regina Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Yongan Gu Yongan Gu U. of Regina Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, November 2005. Paper Number: SPE-97906-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/97906-MS Published: November 01 2005 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Yang, Chaodong, and Yongan Gu. "Effects of Heavy Oil-Solvent Interfacial Tension on Gravity Drainage in the vapor extraction (VAPEX) Process." Paper presented at the SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, November 2005. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/97906-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium Search Advanced Search AbstractThe vapor extraction (VAPEX) process is a promising technology for recovering heavy oil and bitumen resources in an economically viable and environmentally friendly way. Although a number of laboratory experiments have been conducted to study the VAPEX process, the oil recovery mechanisms by gravity drainage in this process are not well understood yet. In this paper, both experimental and theoretical approaches are adopted to study the effects of gravity and the capillary force on gravity drainage in the VAPEX process. First, the interfacial tensions between a heavy oil sample and four different solvents (methane, ethane, propane, and carbon dioxide) are measured at different pressures below their respective vapor pressures by applying the axisymmetric drop shape analysis (ADSA) technique for the pendant drop case. Then, the Bond number, which is defined as the ratio of gravity to the capillary force, is calculated for the VAPEX process in a heavy oil reservoir and in a physical model of sand pack, respectively. It is found that the measured interfacial tension between the heavy oil and a solvent is reduced almost linearly with pressure for the four heavy oil-solvent systems tested. Correspondingly, the Bond number increases with pressure. An increased Bond number indicates relatively large effect of gravity on the VAPEX process and thus enhanced oil recovery.IntroductionThe vapor extraction (VAPEX) process[1, 2] is a non-thermal oil recovery process, in which a vaporized solvent is injected into a heavy oil or bitumen reservoir. The solvent dissolves into the heavy oil so that the oil viscosity is significantly reduced. The diluted oil is then drained by gravity to a lower horizontal production well. Interfacial phenomena play an important role in the gravity drainage flow in a porous medium because gravity, capillary and viscous forces control fluid flow through a porous medium[3]. It has been found that the interfacial tension of a heavy oil-solvent system is reduced when a solvent is injected into an oil reservoir[4, 5]. The reduced interfacial tension alters the gravity-capillary force balance and thus reduces the residual oil saturation. The effects of the heavy oil-solvent interfacial tension on the enhanced oil recovery in the VAPEX process are considered to be significant[4]. Therefore, it is of fundamental and practical importance to study the interfacial tension phenomena in various heavy oil-solvent systems so that a better understanding of the VAPEX process can be achieved.Among many existing methods for determining the interfacial tension, the pendant drop method is probably the most suitable for measuring the interfacial tension between a heavy oil sample and a solvent at high pressures and elevated temperatures[5]. Traditionally, the pendant drop method was used to determine the interfacial tension by photographing a pendant drop and then measuring the drop dimensions from the negative films[6]. This method was significantly improved and utilized to determine the interfacial tensions of the pure hydrocarbon + CO2 systems[7, 8], the synthetic oil + CO2 system, and the crude oil + hydrocarbon gases + CO2 system[9]. More recently, a new sophisticated technique for determining the interfacial tension from the liquid drop shape analysis, known as the axisymmetric drop shape analysis (ADSA) technique for the pendant drop case, has been developed by Rotenberg et al.[10] and further improved by Cheng et al.[11]. In comparison with the other existing methods, the ADSA technique for the pendant drop case is accurate for the interfacial tension measurement (±0.05 mN/m), fully automatic, and completely free of the operator's subjectivity. At present, this technique has become a standard method for measuring the interfacial tension. Keywords: pendant drop case, pendant oil drop, enhanced recovery, physical model, bitumen, pressure cell, methane, equilibrium interfacial tension, vapex process, propane Subjects: Improved and Enhanced Recovery, Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs, Oil sand, oil shale, bitumen This content is only available via PDF. 2005. SPE/PS-CIM/CHOA International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».