Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
06–701 Boon, Andrew (Toyo Gakuen U, Japan; bromleycross@ hotmail.com ), The search for irony: A textual analysis of the lyrics of ‘Ironic’ by Alanis Morissette . The Reading Matrix (Readingmatrix.com) 5.2 (2005), 129–142. 06–702 Brantmeir, Cindy (Washington U, USA; cbrantme@wustle.edu ), The effects of language of assessment and L2 reading performance on advanced readers' recall . The Reading Matrix (Readingmatrix.com) 6.1 (2006), 1–17. 06–703 Brooks, Wanda (Temple U, Philadelphia, USA), Reading representations of themselves: Urban youth use culture and African American textual features to develop literary understandings . Reading Research Quarterly (International Reading Association) 41.3 (2006), 372–392. 06–704 Burns, Eila (Jyvaskyla U of Applied Sciences, Finland; eila.burns@jypoly.fi ), Pause, prompt and praise – Peer tutored reading for pupils with learning difficulties . British Journal of Special Education (Blackwell) 33.2 (2006), 62–67. 06–705 Carlisle, Joanne F. & C. Addison Stone, Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading . Reading Research Quarterly (International Reading Association) 40.4 (2005), 428–449. 06–706 Cho, Kwangsu, Christian D. Schunn (U Pittsburgh, PA, USA) & Davida Charney, Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication (Sage) 23.3 (2006), 260–294. 06–707 Cunningham, James W. (U North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA) , Stephanie A. Spadorcia, Karen A. Erickson, David A. Koppenhaver, Janet M. Sturm & David E. Yoder , Investigating the instructional supportiveness of leveled texts . Reading Research Quarterly (International Reading Association) 40.4 (2005), 410–427. 06–708 DeVoss, Dànıelle Nıcole & James E. Porter (Michigan State U, USA), Why Napster matters to writing: Filesharing as a new ethic of digital delivery . Computers and Composition (Elsevier) 23.1 (2006), 178–210. 06–709 Ghahremani-ghajar, Sue-San (Al-Zahra U, Iran) & Seyyed Abdolhamid Mirhosseini , English class or speaking about everything class? Dialogue journal writing as a critical EFL literacy practice in an Iranian high school . Language, Culture and Curriculum (Multilingual Matters) 18.3 (2005), 286–299. 06–710 Hunter, Darryl (U British Columbia, Canada; Darrylinvic@hotmail.com ) , Charles Mayenga & Trevor Gambell , Classroom assessment tools and uses: Canadian English teachers' practices for writing . Assessing Writing (Elsevier) 11.1 (2006), 42–65. 06–711 Jarratt, Susan C., Elızabeth Losh & Davıd Puente (U California at Irvine, USA), Transnational identifications: Biliterate writers in a first-year humanities course . Journal of Second Language Writing (Elsevier) 15.1 (2006), 24–48. 06–712 Jocson, Korina M. (Stanford U, USA), ‘Bob Dylan and Hip Hop’: Intersecting literacy practices in youth poetry communities . Written Communication (Sage) 23.3 (2006), 231–259. 06–713 Jones, Rodney H., Angel Garralda, Davıd C. S. Lı & Graham Lock (City U Hong Kong, China), Interactional dynamics in on-line and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers . Journal of Second Language Writing (Elsevier) 15.1 (2006), 1–23. 06–714 Kruse, Otto (Zurich U of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland), The origins of writing in the disciplines: Traditions of seminar writing and the Humboldtian ideal of the research university. Written Communication (Sage) 23.3 (2006), 331–352. 06–715 Li, Jiang ( jianli@enoreo.on.ca ), The mediation of technology in ESL writing and its implications for writing assessment . Assessing Writing (Elsevier) 11.1 (2006), 5–21. 06–716 Lunsford, Andrea A. (Stanford U, USA), Writing, technologies, and the fifth canon . Computers and Composition (Elsevier) 23.1 (2006), 169–177. 06–717 Marsh, Jackie (U Sheffield, UK), Popular culture in the literacy curriculum: A Bourdieuan analysis . Reading Research Quarterly (International Reading Association) 41.2 (2006), 160–174. 06–718 Martin, Deb (Rowan U, USA; martind@rowan.edu ) & Diane Penrod , Coming to know criteria: The value of an evaluating writing course for undergraduates . Assessing Writing (Elsevier) 11.1 (2006), 66–73. 06–719 McIntyre, Ellen, Diane W. Kyle (U Louisville, USA) & Gayle H. Moore , A primary-grade teacher's guidance toward small-group dialogue . Reading Research Quarterly (International Reading Association) 41.1 (2006), 36–66. 06–720 McQuillan, Jeff (Center for Educational Development, USA; jeff@learningexperts.com ), The effects of print access and print exposure on English vocabulary acquisition of language minority students . The Reading Matrix (Readingmatrix.com) 6.1 (2006), 41–51. 06–721 Neuman, Susan B. (U Michigan, USA) & Donna Celano , The knowledge gap: Implications of leveling the playing field for low-income and middle-income children . Reading Research Quarterly (International Reading Association), 41.2 (2006), 176–201. 06–722 O'Sullıvan, Íde & Angela Chambers (U Limerick, Ireland), Learners' writing skills in French: Corpus consultation and learner evaluation . Journal of Second Language Writing (Elsevier) 15.1 (2006), 49–68. 06–723 Pino-Silva, Juan (U Simón Bolivar, Venezuela; jpino@usb.ve ), Extensive reading through the internet: Is it worth the while? The Reading Matrix ( Readingmatrix.com ) 6.1 (2006), 85–96. 06–724 Rogers, Theresa (U British Columbia, Canada) Elizabeth Marshall & Cynthia A. Tyson , Dialogic narratives of literacy, teaching, and schooling: Preparing literacy teachers for diverse settings . Reading Research Quarterly (International Reading Association) 41.2 (2006) 202–224. 06–725 Scott, Tony (U North Carolina, USA), Writing work, technology, and pedagogy in the era of late capitalism . Computers and Composition (Elsevier) 23. 1 (2006), 228–243. 06–726 Tian, Shiauping (National Taiwan U of Science and Technology, Taiwan; sptian@mail.ntust.edu.tw. ), Passage dependency of reading comprehension items in the GEPT and the TOEFL . The Reading Matrix (Readingmatrix.com) 6.1 (2006), 66–84. 06–727 Tseng, Yen-Chu & Hsien-Chin Liou (National Tsing Hua U, China; hcliu@mx.nthu.edu.tw ), The effects of online conjunction materials on college EFL students' writing . System (Elsevier) 34.2 (2006), 270–283. 06–728 VanderStaay, Steven L. (Western Washington U, Bellingham, USA), Learning from longitudinal research in criminology and the health sciences . Reading Research Quarterly (International Reading Association) 41.3 (2006), 328–350. <jats:
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle