MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4252327714 · doi:10.2523/60728-ms

Pipeline Intervention From a Dynamically Positioned Mono-Hull Vessel via a Flexible Riser

2000· article· en· W4252327714 sur OpenAlexaff
Samih M. Alsyed, Henrik Legind Larsen, Johnston Paul, Fred Schaider, Lounsbury Jack, Jeffrey W. Smith

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueOil and Gas Production Techniques
Établissements canadiensApache (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCitationPipeline (software)Computer scienceDownloadLibrary scienceWorld Wide WebOperating system

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Pipeline Intervention From a Dynamically Positioned Mono-Hull Vessel via a Flexible Riser Samih M. Alsyed; Samih M. Alsyed Schlumberger Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Henrik A. Larsen; Henrik A. Larsen Schlumberger Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paul Johnston; Paul Johnston Chevron Inc. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Fred J. Schaider; Fred J. Schaider Apache Corp Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Jack Lounsbury; Jack Lounsbury CDI Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Jeffrey J. Smith Jeffrey J. Smith CETCO Environmental Offshore Services Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable, Houston, Texas, April 2000. Paper Number: SPE-60728-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/60728-MS Published: April 05 2000 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Alsyed, Samih M., Larsen, Henrik A., Johnston, Paul, Schaider, Fred J., Lounsbury, Jack, and Jeffrey J. Smith. "Pipeline Intervention From a Dynamically Positioned Mono-Hull Vessel via a Flexible Riser." Paper presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable, Houston, Texas, April 2000. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/60728-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractAfter a subsea mudslide near the mouth of the Mississippi River Delta, several sections of production or export pipelines were severed. The pipelines could not be retrieved to surface because they were buried deeply in the mud. Coiled tubing was successfully used to clean and abandon these pipelines in-situ under 200-feet of water. The coiled tubing was conveyed through a flexible riser from a Dynamic Positioning mono-hull vessel. The lengths of the four sections of pipeline cleaned were 2400-feet, 1200-feet and 1800-feet with diameters of 8–10 inches.IntroductionCoiled tubing has been used for years for workover purposes on oil and gas wells. A limited number of coiled tubing applications involve cleaning out pipelines from production platforms. In all these applications coiled tubing is conveyed through a solid metal riser with known friction factors.During hurricane Georges in September 1998, several operators in the Gulf of Mexico had their pipelines in the South and Main Pass areas severed by mudslides. After repairs were completed, four pipelines were scheduled for abandonment. Because divers were unable to locate one end of each of these pipelines, these could not be flushed using conventional means. Normally, offshore operators abandon pipelines either by removal for disposal onshore or by abandonment in place. This requires approval from the Minerals Management Service. Both abandonment alternatives require that the pipelines be thoroughly cleaned to ensure that pollution does dot occur.Divers use jetting equipment to expose the pipelines on the sea floor. The exposed ends can then be retrieved to surface and flushed to a facility. In the present case, the sections were buried more than 20 -feet in the mud and could not be retrieved.An initial attempt to remove the hydrocarbons was made by applying suction to the exposed end of the pipeline. This was not successful as a mud plug was formed at the buried end. The only remaining option was to enter the pipeline, in-situ under the sea, with coiled tubing. Due to the fact that the pipelines were located in a mudslide and the water was too deep for a jack-up boat, a Dynamically Positioned (DP) vessel was used. Coiled Tubing was placed on the deck of the vessel and the work was performed through the moon pool.Location and History of the PipelinesThe four sections to clean and abandon were three 8-inch sections, two 1200-feet and one 2400-feet, and a 1800-feet long 10-inch pipeline section. These pipelines were located in South Pass and Main Pass sections of Gulf of Mexico, southeast of New Orleans. The 8-inch pipelines were utilized to transport produced fluids between platforms. These pipeline sections contained approximately 10% hydrocarbons. The 10-inch pipeline contained 100 % hydrocarbonsRiser SelectionUsually well intervention operations offshore are performed from either a platform or a jackup boat. For the reasons mentioned above and the need for diver support, it was then decided to use a dynamically positioned monohull vessel. Keywords: moon pool, hose, flange, spe 60728, computer design, society of petroleum engineers, pipeline section, riser hose, riser, platform Subjects: Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers, Risers This content is only available via PDF. 2000. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,207
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,002
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,207
Écart entre enseignants0,201 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing RoundtableMême sujetOil and Gas Production TechniquesTravaux en français237 207