Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The entire world is still under the influence of the virulent pandemic COVID-19. Unfortunately, each of us is affected one way or another. Our conference, the 6th International Conference on Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering (ICMAE 2020) was not an exception. In December we held our conference online and although the same it was a great success and we, as other conferences, continued in our sharing research success. This change to virtual was achieved by using Tencent VooV software. Each keynote speech lasted 40 minutes, invited speech 30 minutes and authors presentation 15 minutes. Each presentation was included with questions and answers. that offered a chat function though the software used to increase participation. The success and prosperity of the conference is reflected high level of the papers received. ICMAE 2020 became an effective communication platform for all the participants over the world and unlike some that claim international reach this conference was truly international. ICMAE 2020 was organized by Hong Kong Society of Mechanical Engineers. This conference aims to provide a platform for researchers and engineers to share their ideas, recent developments, and successful practices in Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering. More than 40 participants attended the conference, they were from USA, UK, Italy, Russia, Colombia, Canada, India, Malaysia, Japan, China and more. Three renowned speakers given speeches about their latest research and reports. They are: Prof. Dan Zhang from York University, Canada; Prof. Ian McAndrew from Capitol Technology University, USA; Prof. Andrew Rae from University of the Highlands and Islands, UK. The conference also had 2 technical session and 1 poster sessions. The conference proceeding is a compilation of the accepted papers and represent an interesting outcome of the conference. This book covers 2 chapters: 1. Aeronautical Engineering; 2. Mechanical Engineering. We would like to acknowledge all of those who supported ICMAE 2020. Each individual and institutional help were very important for the success of this conference. Especially we would like to thank the committee chairs, committee members and reviewers, for their tremendous contribution in conference organization and peer review of the papers. We sincerely hope that ICMAE 2020 will be a forum for excellent discussions that will put forward new ideas and promote collaborative research and support researchers as they take their work forward. We are sure that the proceedings will serve as an important research source of references and the knowledge, which will lead to not only scientific and engineering progress but also other new products and processes. Finally, we hope to meet you all in person at our next conference in 2021. Editors: Dan Zhang, York University, Canada Ian McAndrew, Capitol Technology University, USA List of COMMITTEES LIST are available in this pdf.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,528 | 0,370 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».