MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4252776081 · doi:10.2118/2007-109

Stability of THAI Process-Theoretical and Experimental Observations

2007· article· en· W4252776081 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Greaves, T.X. Xia, Alex Turta

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueNuclear Physics and Applications
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésProcess (computing)Computer scienceProgramming language

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract The performance of the THAI ™ process has been investigated in numerous 3D experiments, using heavy crudes and Athabasca Oil Sands bitumen. The stability of the process is demonstrated by high combustion zone temperatures, absence of gas channelling, insensitivity to large changes in air injection rate, tolerance of an overlying gas cap, increased combustion temperature and faster upgrading response with increasing oil layer thickness, ‘controlled gas override’, its own ‘front tracking’ capability, and steady oil production rate. The most important parameters for upscaling of experimental scale performance to field scale are combustion front temperature and combustion front velocity. Early stage results from the WHITESANDS THAI ™ field pilot, at Christina Lake – high combustion zone temperatures (600-700 °C), high fluids production (40–50% bitumen cut) and signs of partial upgrading of the produced oil, are very encouraging for development of THAI ™ on a commercial scale. Introduction There is a long and tortuous history concerning the in-situ combustion (ISC) process, as applied to heavy crude and oil sands reservoirs. Some parts of it were glorious, but there were also many failures, often because of poorly chosen reservoirs. One of the main reasons why projects failed was lack of control of propagation of the in-situ combustion front. In many cases, there was a lack of understanding of the part played by gravity, and hence gravity segregation. Since the first field test of the ISC process in 1951, more than 160 field pilots have been conducted; most of them were carried out in the period 1970–1990. This led to the development of both the dry and wet ISC processes. They were tested for normal heavy oil and for oil sands, using air and enriched air. However, the commercial application of ISC was attained only for heavy crude reservoirs, around 1970, using air injection. At that time, most operators started to realize that ISC was actually a gas displacement process, benefiting from the oil viscosity reduction, due to heat generated by ISC reactions. Therefore, as in any gas displacement process, the injectors should be located at the most updip position. As of April 1992, according to an OGJ report, the incremental daily production from ISC was approximately 4,700 BOPD (from 8 projects) in the USA, 8,000 BOPD (from 10 projects) in the former Soviet Union, 7,300 BOPD (from 3 projects) in Canada and 12,000 BOPD (from 5 projects) in Romania. Thus, the 1992 world incremental daily oil production due to ISC was about 32,000 BOPD (from 26 reported projects)1,2. This included 19 commercial operations and 7 semi-industrial projects. Currently, only four commercial heavy oil projects are active; namely, Suplacu de Barcau (Romania), Balol and Santhal projects (India) and Bayou State Oil Corp. (BSOC), in Bellevue, Louisiana, USA. The first three projects are operated using a peripheral line drive, starting from the uppermost part of the reservoir and going downdip, while the last one is operated in patterns. The Suplacu de Barcau project is the world's largest ISC operation, having been operated continuously for 40 years. It is applied in a very shallow heavy oil reservoir.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,543
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceMême sujetNuclear Physics and ApplicationsTravaux en français237 207