MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4252909665 · doi:10.2118/2009-052

Estimation of Relative Permeability by Assisted History Matching Using the Ensemble Kalman Filter Method

2009· article· en· W4252909665 sur OpenAlex
H. Li, S. Chen, Daoyong Yang, Paitoon Tontiwachwuthikul

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Regina
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPetroleum Technology Research Centre
Mots-clésKalman filterEnsemble Kalman filterFast Kalman filterExtended Kalman filterComputer scienceMatching (statistics)Moving horizon estimationFiltering theoryPermeability (electromagnetism)EstimationStatisticsAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsEngineeringChemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, a novel technique has been developed to implicitly estimate the relative permeability by history matching three-phase production data with the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF). Power law repetitive of the relative permeability curves is utilized, while both endpoints and shape of the relative permeability curve are included in the state vectors which are updated by assimilating the observed data sequentially. The newly developed technique has been validated with accurately evaluating the relative permeability in a synthetic reservoir with two-dimension and three-phase flow. It is shown from the synthetic case that good estimation of the relative permeability curves can be obtained by assimilating the observed oil rates, gas-oil ratios and well bottomhole pressures of the production wells. Both the shape factors and the endpoints of the relative permeability curves are accurately evaluated; however, a larger ensemble size is needed to avoid the filter divergence. Compared to the existing implicit methods, the newly developed technique does not require the gradient of the objective function and thus makes it easy to implement. Introduction Relative permeability is not only one of the most important parameters used in reservoir characterization, but also crucial for predicting reservoir performance throughout the life of a reservoir. In general, relative permeability is obtained from the displacement experiments with core samples. However, due to the huge scaling difference between the core samples and the reservoir as well as the difference between the experimental conditions and the formation conditions, direct application of estimated results generated from core samples to the whole reservoir may induce significant errors in evaluating the reservoir performance. Furthermore, interpretation of the laboratory experiment data may also add further uncertainty to the process of reservoir simulation. Therefore, it is of practical and fundamental importance to accurately evaluate the relative permeability in hydrocarbon reservoirs. In principle, estimation of the relative permeability curve can be obtained inversely by history matching the production data obtained from the displacement experiments or field operations[1–6]. A brief description of the process of implicit relative permeability estimation method is provided as follows. Prior to the history matching, a relative permeability representation model is selected and initialized. Then, reservoir simulation is conducted by using the initial relative permeability curve to generate the simulated production data. Subsequently, the relative permeability curves are adjusted using a robust algorithm to minimize the discrepancy between the simulated production data and the field observation data. Once the discrepancy is minimized, the corresponding relative permeability curve is regarded as the approximation of the real relative permeability curves. The relative permeability representation models are classified into two categories: the functional model and the nonfunctional model. Among the functional models, the power law model, which determines the relative permeability curve by the endpoints and the exponential factors, is the most widely used model[4, 6]. Compared to the functional models, the nonfunctional models are more flexible and show more degrees of freedom, among which the cubic or B-spline curve are commonly applied to represent the relative permeability.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,558
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,647

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,289
Écart entre enseignants0,253 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle