The Mechanical Earth Model Concept and Its Application to High-Risk Well Construction Projects
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Mechanical Earth Model Concept and Its Application to High-Risk Well Construction Projects Richard Plumb; Richard Plumb Schlumberger Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Stephen Edwards; Stephen Edwards Schlumberger Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Gary Pidcock; Gary Pidcock Schlumberger Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Donald Lee; Donald Lee Schlumberger Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Brian Stacey Brian Stacey Schlumberger Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, February 2000. Paper Number: SPE-59128-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/59128-MS Published: February 23 2000 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Plumb, Richard, Edwards, Stephen, Pidcock, Gary, Lee, Donald, and Brian Stacey. "The Mechanical Earth Model Concept and Its Application to High-Risk Well Construction Projects." Paper presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, February 2000. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/59128-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractMany of today's well construction projects are technically and economically challenging. Examples include deepwater exploration wells in the Gulf of Mexico, offshore field development projects such as Hibernia, Newfoundland, Canada and onshore field development projects in tectonically active regions such as the Cusiana field in Colombia. Minimizing non-productive time associated with wellbore instability and unexpected pore pressure regimes reduces the risk of dangerous accidents and is required to complete the well on time and within budget. Minimizing non-productive time is a complex task that requires thorough pre-spud planning to identify drilling risks and geological hazards and to develop contingency plans for handling those risks. Building a mechanical earth model during the well planning phase and revising it in real time has proven to be extremely valuable in delivering complex wells safely while minimizing unplanned well construction costs. Monitoring and revising the model while drilling requires geomechanics expertise, teamwork, data management and excellent communications among service companies and their client.This paper defines a mechanical earth model, explains why it is important, how it is developed and how it is applied to well construction and field development. We will discuss sources of information and the multi-disciplinary team approach required to: generate, revise and maintain an earth model. Three examples of the application of the earth model concept are discussed.IntroductionMore of today's well construction and field development projects are both technically and economically challenging. Understanding the geomechanics of well construction is becoming increasing important in order to drill technically and economically challenging wells on budget.Wells with hostile pore pressure and fracture gradient profiles require a good pre-drill pore pressure and fracture gradient prediction in order to design a suitable casing program. A casing program designed on a profile significantly less hostile than that encountered may compromise the attainable TD of the well. The cost of materials and rig time spent running extra casing significantly adds to the cost of the well. The risk of taking kicks which can be both costly and dangerous can also be reduced by a more rigorous pre-drill pore pressure prediction coupled with real-time pore pressure analysis from LWD measurements. In the deepwater Gulf of Mexico there are examples of wells which require a good mechanical earth model (MEM) in order to be drilled at all.Despite decades of industry attention, wellbore instability is responsible for many costly stuck pipe incidents. Stuck pipe is responsible for lost BHAs and considerable NPT spent freeing pipe, performing additional wiper trips and hole cleaning. In cases where wellbore stability problems are severe, the economics of developing a field can become challenging, for example the Cusiana field in Colombia, S.A. Other fields where lesser wellbore stability problems may still challenge the field economics are found where the cost of drilling is very high, e.g. the Hibernia field offshore Canada and or fields in the North Sea. Keywords: wellbore design, reservoir geomechanics, iadc spe 59128, prediction, drilling, forecast, mechanical earth model concept, mem, mud weight, earth model Subjects: Wellbore Design, Reservoir Characterization, Wellbore integrity, Reservoir geomechanics This content is only available via PDF. 2000. IADC/SPE Drilling Conference You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».