MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4253070888 · doi:10.2523/90556-ms

Petroleum Engineering Education - Challenges and Changes for the Next 20 Years

2004· article· en· W4253070888 sur OpenAlexafffundabout
J.C. Cunha, Luciane Cunha

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Mots-clésCitationExhibitionLibrary sciencePetroleumPetroleum industryComputer scienceEngineeringWorld Wide WebArchaeologyHistoryGeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Petroleum Engineering Education - Challenges and Changes for the Next 20 Years J.C. Cunha; J.C. Cunha The University of Alberta Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Luciane B. Cunha Luciane B. Cunha The University of Alberta Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, September 2004. Paper Number: SPE-90556-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/90556-MS Published: September 26 2004 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Cunha, J.C., and Luciane B. Cunha. "Petroleum Engineering Education - Challenges and Changes for the Next 20 Years." Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, September 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/90556-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractThis article indicates some basic knowledge and skills that should be present on the education of today's petroleum engineering students. Concurrently it presents some thoughts and points out directions for petroleum engineering education in the next few decades.The importance of interaction between petroleum engineering schools and the oil industry is analyzed and some directions to improvement of this relationship are given.The challenge and importance of attracting better and brightest students are commented and some suggestions related to how schools and industry should jointly participate in the efforts to keenly achieve this goal are listed.Introduction"Petroleum engineers make the world run." This proud quote, extracted from the Society of Petroleum Engineers' website indicates how highly we regard our career and, at the same time, indicates how important it should be the educational process that will prepare the next generation of engineers to fulfill the industry needs.Petroleum engineering, as a formal academic course, is about to complete its first century1. Obviously, educational methods, as well as industry technology, have undergone tremendous changes that are somehow reflected in current courses. Basic skills for a petroleum engineer, besides mastering fundamentals of mathematics, physics and chemistry, will include:Geology;Well drilling technology;Formation evaluation;Oil and gas production technology;Properties of reservoir rocks;Properties of reservoir fluids;Fluid flow in porous media;Reservoir analysis and management.There is evidence2 that, regarding basic technical knowledge, the majority of newly petroleum engineering graduates are well prepared. On the other hand, apparently this is not true with regard to the fast-changing requirements of the oil industry, where there is an expectancy that young professionals will be prepared to exercise leadership, deal with business issues and implement policies that will contribute to corporate success and profitability.It is probably unrealistic to expect to find the aforementioned set of skills on a recently graduate. However, as a goal, petroleum engineering education should provide the students with the means to use their technical background and personal qualification to acquire those skills after a short period of time subsequent to graduation.Clearly, achievement of that goal will depend not only on university infrastructure, laboratory facilities and well prepared professors. Fundamental importance should also be given to recruitment of students. Two recent panels3,4 have reached similar conclusions regarding the fact that attracting the "best and the brightest" students is essential and somewhat is an objective that is not being completely fulfilled by petroleum engineering schools.Importance of Industry-University InteractionOver the last twenty years the field of Petroleum Engineering has undergone major changes. The evolution of technology as well as the increasing presence of computerized tools in nearly all stages of the exploration-production process has generated new needs in the educational system. One frequent comment is that Academia not always has evolved fast enough in order to meet those needs.The perception that universities do not follow, with the necessary fast pace, the trends of the industry (the real world) is present in almost every discipline. Most of the times this perception does not represent a completely fair view of Academia. Universities do not have to concentrate only on the development of mere technical skills. Knowledge of fundamentals of the exact sciences is still very important for engineers and the efforts dedicated to master those concepts should not be influenced by new developments and the immediateness of the industry. On the other hand, it must be recognized that academic courses should somehow be influenced and reflect changes undergone by the industry. For that matter, a close collaboration between Industry and Academia will certainly contribute to better prepare future professionals. Keywords: society of petroleum engineers, spe, upstream oil & gas, petroleum engineering school, petroleum engineering education, knowledge, university curricula, exhibition, engineering student, presentation Subjects: Professionalism, Training, and Education, University curricula This content is only available via PDF. 2004. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,411
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,352

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,271
Écart entre enseignants0,234 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2004
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionMême sujetReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsTravaux en français237 207