Aquifer Controls on Coalbed Methane Development in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aquifer Controls on Coalbed Methane Development in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming P. R. Onsager; P. R. Onsager Questa Engineering Corporation Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar D. O. Cox D. O. Cox Questa Engineering Corporation Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, October 2000. Paper Number: SPE-63090-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/63090-MS Published: October 01 2000 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Onsager, P. R., and D. O. Cox. "Aquifer Controls on Coalbed Methane Development in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming." Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, October 2000. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/63090-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search Abstract Development of coalbed methane (CBM) in the Wyodak-Anderson seams of the Powder River Basin, Wyoming, is one of the most active plays in the world. Compared to other CBM producing basins, the Powder River Basin subbituminous coal has relatively low gas content (20–50 scf/ton), but high permeability (100s of millidarcy to 1+ darcy). Because of the shallow depth, Powder River Basin CBM development is normally on 40- or 80-acre well spacing. Another significant difference between the Powder River Basin and other producing CBM basins is the fact that the coal seams of the Powder River Basin are overlain and underlain by large, thick aquifers that are essentially infinite-acting in nature. The degree of hydraulic connection between these aquifers and the coal is a critical factor in the economics of gas production from this play. Where the aquifers are well connected to the coal, water influx or leakance is high, leading to a nearly steady-state pressure environment that will deter efforts to dewater the coal and produce methane. Using reservoir simulation analyses and actual field data on gas and water production, this paper examines the effect of aquifer leakance on the producibility of the coal. Optimum well spacing in the Powder River Basin is shown to depend on having sufficient wells per section to lift the water that leaks into the coal from the aquifers. In fact, in some parts of the basin, aquifer leakance will maintain reservoir pressure high enough that it will curtail methane desorption and restrict ultimate gas recovery. Further testing and analysis to better characterize the aquifers and their connection to the coal is necessary. Keywords: production rate, upstream oil & gas, permeability, complex reservoir, spe 63090, recovery efficiency, efficiency, coal seam gas, coalbed methane, production profile Subjects: Well & Reservoir Surveillance and Monitoring, Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs, Coal seam gas Copyright 2000, Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».