MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4253150300 · doi:10.5325/eugeoneirevi.34.2.0266

Hughie

2013· article· en· W4253150300 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nelson Pressley

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Eugene O Neill Review · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDramaArtCLARITYCharacter (mathematics)Art historyGratitudeVisual artsPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Eugene O'Neill's brief 1942 letter to George Jean Nathan is the standard touchstone for reviews and analyses of the one-act Hughie, and its ubiquity is understandable. The two-character, three-o'clock-in-the-morning drama about a melancholy Broadway sport and a taciturn night clerk was never produced in O'Neill's lifetime, leaving a regrettable void of documentation—neither grousing nor gratitude from the dramatist about problems solved or worsened as the work got on its feet. Additionally, the script has a conspicuous tic: the Night Clerk barely speaks, yet he is given a near-riot of written articulation in the form of unspoken stage directions. As Erie Smith, the voluble small-time hustler, waxes on about his mock triumphs and paralyzing regrets while memorializing the recently deceased Hughie, the hotel's previous night clerk, the stage directions read, “The Clerk's mind has slipped away to the clanging bounce of garbage cans in the outer night. He is thinking: A job I'd like. I'd bang those cans louder than they do! I'd wake up the whole damned city!” It is a characteristic description, tantalizing in its clarity—but how to put it on the stage? O'Neill mused to Nathan that any satisfying production of Hughie might require some combination of sound and film, but added, “Let whoever does it figure it out. I wouldn't want to be around to see it.”Seventy years on, director Doug Hughes has taken up O'Neill's suggestion of voiceover and video possibilities in his production for Washington, DC's Shakespeare Theatre Company. The hour-long show cleverly camouflaged several video screens into the dingy beige walls of Neil Patel's vast and vacant purgatorial hotel lobby set. Now and then Erie's reveries cued a mood or memory that Hughes and projection designer Darrel Maloney depicted with gauzy images that manifested and vanished like dreams. A woman's face, for instance, flickered into view before shifting and dissolving as if erased by a creeping layer of soot. This image and others never suffered from on-the-nose obviousness, nor were they a constant presence in the design. They tactfully underscored Erie's haunted storytelling.The voiceover was a greater threat to upstage the acting, or so it seemed as laughter greeted early stage directions drily uttered by Reg Rogers (whose radio-ready voice, redolent of blunt 1930s–1940s announcers, was recorded, not live). Laughter was an unanticipated factor a year ago as the STC staged the aside-filled Strange Interlude (a production that indirectly led to this show when actor Richard Schiff, joining the STC for a benefit event last year, noted the Interlude poster and suggested Hughie). Rogers's deadpan stage directions, coupled with the granite postures and blank demeanor of Randall Newsome as the Night Clerk, sometimes added gravitas, but it also continued to trigger comic relief periodically through the performance. O'Neill's colorful language was welcome, to a point, as it helped round out both the late night cityscape and the largely wordless clerk. But it did not resolve the challenge of fully rendering this character. Al Pacino also tried voicing the stage directions in his 1996 production, which Schiff read with Pacino in very early preproduction stages. For a Hughie last year in Toronto, the Night Clerk's stage directions were rendered in supertitles. The quest continues.The core of the show, of course, is the actor playing Erie Smith, a part that has been donned by such major O'Neill interpreters as Jason Robards and Brian Dennehy. Schiff's turn was magnetic yet offhand as he shuffled into the shabby lobby and coolly initiated the slangy chat and one-sided banter with Newsome's fleetingly cheerful but durably dull clerk. The play's flamboyantly idiomatic language, packed with the streetwise lingo of the gambler, the womanizer, and the subtle self-promoter, felt effortless and personable—an intimate performance Erie had long tuned for Hughie. The new clerk's nonresponsiveness is a comedown from Hughie's ready ear and flattering attentiveness, which goads Erie back toward his unhappy self. Hughie is a pipe-dream play, and Schiff, costumed by Catherine Zuber in a rumpled three-piece beige suit only slightly brighter than the grubby walls, artfully conveyed Erie's need to be seen and heard; his lightly worn wiliness and inviting cadences were those of a canny, understated salesman. (Possibly certain patterns from Schiff's winter engagement on Broadway in David Mamet's Glengarry Glen Ross, a Pacino vehicle that Schiff acted at night while rehearsing Hughie by day, were still in his muscles and somewhere in his mind.)Schiff and Hughes made notably effective use of the ample emptiness Patel created on both sides of the STC's Lansburgh Theater stage. No moments were more poignant than those when Schiff's Erie drifted away from the lobby's desk, above which an oversized wall clock kept actual time as the dial swept from three to four. In the Hopper-esque solitude of the set's outer edges, Schiff's stillness and/or sudden explosiveness sharply etched Erie's dead end. “I'm fond of Hughie myself,” O'Neill wrote to Nathan in that 1942 letter. The nuance of Hughes's staging, particularly in Schiff's wounded, slightly rakish, wholly sympathetic portrayal of Erie, made O'Neill's a sentiment to endorse.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,247
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,993

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0360,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,068
Tête enseignante GPT0,284
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Eugene O Neill ReviewMême sujetCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary ResearchTravaux en français237 207