MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4253301838 · doi:10.2523/98896-ms

Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Ultrahigh Temperature on the MechanicalParameters of Cement

2006· article· en· W4253301838 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
D. A. Stiles

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of IADC/SPE Drilling Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueDrilling and Well Engineering
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCementCitationComputer scienceDrillingMaterials scienceEngineeringComposite materialLibrary scienceMechanical engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Ultrahigh Temperature on the Mechanical Parameters of Cement David Stiles David Stiles ExxonMobil Development Co. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Miami, Florida, USA, February 2006. Paper Number: SPE-98896-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/98896-MS Published: February 21 2006 Connected Content Related to: Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Ultrahigh Temperature on the Mechanical Parameters of Cement Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Stiles, David. "Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Ultrahigh Temperature on the Mechanical Parameters of Cement." Paper presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Miami, Florida, USA, February 2006. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/98896-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractLong-term mechanical durability of a cement sheath exposed to stresses in a wellbore environment is critical to maintaining zonal isolation for the life of a well. The ability of a cement sheath to remain intact when exposed to changing wellbore stresses is highly dependent upon the parameters of Young's Modulus, Poisson's Ratio and tensile strength of the cement and the surrounding rock. Wellbore stresses sufficient to cause failure of a cement sheath may result from changes in temperature, casing pressure, formation pressure, or near-wellbore tectonic stresses.Wells subjected to Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS) for heavy oil recovery undergo extreme temperature changes that impart substantial stresses on the cement sheath. During CSS, wellbore temperatures can fluctuate between 77°F and 645°F, potentially leading to cement sheath failure. Various Finite Element Analysis models exist that are useful in predicting the failure potential of a cement sheath. These models require input of cement mechanical parameters. Mechanical parameters of numerous cement formulations have been measured in recent years but none of those measurements was made after long-term exposure of the cement to the ultra-high temperatures encountered in CSS wells. Development of such data was required to model the risk of cement sheath failure in wells subjected to CSS.This paper presents a test methodology for measuring the mechanical parameters of five cement formulations after exposure to a temperature of 645°F. Parameters of Young's Modulus, Poisson's Ratio and tensile strength were measured. Evolution of these parameters over a two-year period is presented. The temperature conditions to which the cement was exposed was found to have a significant impact on the mechanical parameters. The Young's Modulus, Poisson's Ratio and tensile strength of systems exposed to 645°F varied significantly from systems exposed to an ambient temperature of 77°F. The mechanical parameters of each individual cement formulation were also markedly different. Specialized cement systems, such as foamed cement or blends containing flexible particles, did not necessarily have mechanical parameters that were better suited for use in CSS wells than some of the more conventional formulations.IntroductionThe Cold Lake development in Eastern Alberta, Canada has been operated by Imperial Oil Resources since the mid-1980's. It is the largest in-situ heavy oil recovery operation in Canada and one of the largest thermal heavy oil operations in the world. Production of the heavy oil is enabled by CSS, which entails injecting steam into the reservoir above fracture pressure and producing a mixture of bitumen, gas and water from the same wells.There is a continuous effort to enhance thermal well integrity at Cold Lake including providing casing integrity and hydraulic isolation throughout the life of each well. Significant casing integrity improvements have already been achieved by controlling the wellbore environment during production operations and upgrading the casing connections in order to minimize the potential for casing failure. One step to achieving further improvement was to gain a more complete understanding of cement sheath performance in the thermal environment at Cold Lake.Historically within the oil and gas industry, the only concern with cement formulations at ultra-high temperatures was chemical stability. Portland cement's loss of compressive strength and increase in permeability at temperatures above 235°F was discussed in the literature as early as 1935.[1] This phenomenon, commonly referred to as strength retrogression, is the result of the morphological changes of the crystalline structure of cement when it is exposed to elevated temperatures. Preventing strength retrogression by the addition of finely ground crystalline silica at a concentration of 35 – 40% by weight of cement (BWOC) was discovered nearly 50 years ago and has been the industry standard ever since.[2] All of the cement formulations that have been used throughout the Cold Lake project contained the recognized silica concentration. Keywords: Wellbore Design, wellbore integrity, Upstream Oil & Gas, strength, cement formulation, casing and cementing, splitting tensile strength, axial, Cold Lake, cement property Subjects: Wellbore Design, Casing and Cementing, Wellbore integrity, Cement formulation (chemistry, properties) This content is only available via PDF. 2006. IADC/SPE Drilling Conference You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,054
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,883

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,184
Écart entre enseignants0,178 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of IADC/SPE Drilling ConferenceMême sujetDrilling and Well EngineeringTravaux en français237 207