T90. QUANTIFYING THE CORE DEFICIT IN CLASSICAL SCHIZOPHRENIA
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background For more than 100 years, disorganization and impoverishment of mental activity have been recognised as fundamental symptoms of schizophrenia. These symptoms may reflect a core brain process underlying persisting disability. Predisposition to persisting disability is a clinically important aspect of schizophrenia, yet the psychopathological processes predisposing to persisting disability are poorly understood. The delineation of a putative core deficit associated with persisting disability would be of potentially great value in delineating the underlying pathological processes and eventually in enhancing treatment. Aims To derive scores for mental disorganization and impoverishment from commonly used rating scales, and test the hypothesis that disorganization and impoverishment, along with impaired cognition and role-function reflect a latent variable that is a plausible candidate for the putative core deficit. Methods In a group of 40 patients with schizophrenia, we tested the hypothesis that mental disorganization and impoverishment, along with impaired cognition and role-function reflect a latent variable that is a plausible candidate for the core deficit. We derived disorganization and impoverishment factors from three symptom scales: PANSS, SSPI and CASH. For each of the three scales, we demonstrated significant correlation between these factors and impaired role function assessed using the Social and Occupational Functioning Scale (SOFAS) and cognitive impairment measured using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). We then assessed the relationship between this latent “core deficit” variable and Post Movement Beta Rebound (PMBR), measured using magnetoencephalography and associated with persisting brain disorders. Results A single factor model provided excellent fit for the four features of core deficit, requiring no further modifications. Results were consistently similar for measures from all three scales. χ2 value was non-significant (range: 0.30 to 2.13, df = 2, p > 0.35), GFI met the threshold of greater than 0.9 (range = .976 to .996) and RMSEA was lesser than 0.06 (range = 0.000 to 0.040). PMBR was found to be significantly reduced in the schizophrenia group compared to healthy controls (t (28) =44.2 ± 12.1, p = 0.001). PMBR was strongly correlated with disorganization (r (40) = .600, p=0.001). In the hierarchical regression, neither age nor medication dose were significant predictors, but PMBR did predict the severity of the core deficit (F (1, 23) = 12.6, P=0.002, R² = -.592). Discussion Scores for the two latent variables representing impoverishment and disorganization of mental activity in schizophrenia can be derived from each of three symptom rating scales. A composite measure of impoverishment, disorganization, impaired cognition and impaired role function reflects an underlying psychopathological process that might be described as the core deficit of classical schizophrenia.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,016 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».