MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4253490576 · doi:10.5342/michhistrevi.39.1.0140

[sans titre]

2013· article· W4253490576 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tim Alan Garrison

Notice bibliographique

RevueMichigan Historical Review · 2013
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEphemeraTourismPopularityState (computer science)Plan (archaeology)HistoryArchaeologyArt historyLawPolitical scienceComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

140 The Michigan Historical Review What separates this book from the other Vintage Views titles is that this volume extends beyond a single region and deals with larger Michigan history topics, the first of these being how Michigan came to have the road system it has today. Initially, rural road construction was focused more on bicycles than automobiles but the urban success and popularity of cars meant people began traveling outside of cities only to find roads whose construction was locally controlled and whose quality standards varied wildly. There was no cooperation or coordination at the county and state levels. But with the Good Roads Movement, including groups such as the West Michigan Lake Shore Highway Association and leaders such as Horatio Earl and Dr. William DeKliene, Michigan developed a master plan that would improve road construction and change travel patterns forever. The authors also discuss how this particular road—an extension of the larger national Dixie Highway—changed lives and communities throughout the state as tourism grew as an economic force in areas that previously were excluded because they were not on railroad or steamship routes. As the title suggests, starting as nothing more than a path, US 31 became a thoroughfare rivaling the famous Route 66 in its cultural and economic importance to generations of travelers. This really is a “Michigan” book that is filled with carefully chosen images and examples of ephemera and text that both explain and illustrate this delightful bit of transportation, cultural, and economic history. Michael Federspiel, Executive Director Little Traverse Historical Society, Petoskey, Michigan Matthew L. M. Fletcher. The Eagle Returns: The Legal History of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 2012. Pp. 257. Bibliography Index. Notes. Cloth, $29.95. Fletcher’s work adds to a growing library of indigenous legal histories. The Grand Traverse Band consists of communities from the Anishinaabek “Three Fires” group of Odawa (Ottawa), Ojibwe (Chippewa or Ojibway), and Bodewadmi (Potawatomi) peoples, who all reside in the Grand Traverse Bay area of Michigan’s Lower Peninsula. Fletcher focuses primarily on the band’s efforts to restore its land base, Book Reviews 141 political autonomy, and usufructuary rights, all of which the United States acknowledged in the Treaty of 1836. In that treaty, Grand Traverse and other Anishinaabek leaders ceded about one-third of present-day Michigan to the United States. In exchange, Henry Schoolcraft, the federal negotiator, promised that the United States would establish a permanent reservation for the band. The U.S. Senate, however, limited the commitment to five years. For the next several years, the band continued to push the United States to fulfill the promise made in 1836. In the Treaty of Detroit (1855), federal treaty commissioners offered the band a reservation on the condition that its members abandon communal land-ownership and accept individual allotments of land, an insidious idea that presaged the Dawes (1877) and Curtis (1898) acts mandating the allotment of all indigenous lands. In subsequent decades, most band members sold (or were swindled out of) their allotments; by the end of the nineteenth century the Grand Traverse Band had lost almost its entire land base. To make matters worse, in the 1870s the United States, which had abandoned its policy of dealing with the tribes through treaties, refused to recognize the band or deal with it on a nation-to-nation basis. For the next century, the band tried through various means to reverse what Fletcher calls this “administrative termination” (p. 53). Only in 1980 did the federal government restore the Grand Traverse Band as a recognized nation—it was the first Indian nation to negotiate its way through the Bureau of Indian Affairs’ new tribal-acknowledgment process. From that point forward, the band worked to reestablish its land base and devise new political and legal institutions that integrated and respected traditional mores. In 1984, the band began high-stakes bingo operations and since that time it has opened and expanded a successful casino. The band was often required to litigate in order to protect its interests, and it played a significant role in defining the rights of tribes to operate off-reservation...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,846
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,296
Écart entre enseignants0,267 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMichigan Historical ReviewMême sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsTravaux en français237 207