Mucking About in the Mess: Research-based Education at Quest University Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The design of Quest University Canada began with a blank sheet of paper and a question: How do we create the most effective and engaging undergraduate education for students who will graduate into a rapidly changing, globalized world?The answer was to center education around the formulation of good questions and the processes by which one attempts to address them, rather than focusing instruction on the delivery of information.This leads naturally to having tutors who teach, rather than professors who profess.It leads to seminar rooms rather than lecture halls.It leads to dissolving disciplinary boundaries so good questions can easily cross them.It leads to a student-centered, project-based curriculum of exploration, rather than a fact-based transfer of information and its subsequent regurgitation.It leads to a collaborative rather than a competitive learning environment.And it produces students with highly developed skills in written and oral communication who are instinctively collaborative, inherently trans-disciplinary in their approach to problems, and engaged in their local and global communities.Quest University Canada, the country's first independent, not-for-profit secular university, was created by an act of the British Columbia Legislative Assembly in 2002.By 2006, it had a faculty of seven and a program designed (and approved) to award a single degree: the Bachelor of Arts and Sciences.In September of 2007, we welcomed our first 73 students to a purpose-built campus in Squamish, British Columbia, between the city of Vancouver and the Olympic resort of Whistler.Today we have 50 faculty members, have reached our goal of 700 students, and have 250 graduates striving to change the world.Most universities today are structured around a 19th-century model designed to produce graduates for a 19th-century economy-one that needed experts with heads crammed full of specialized information ready to be applied to an industrial enterprise.These experts usually had a single career during their working lives, and the pace of change in what they needed to know was modest.Problems were local or, at most, national in scale, and interaction with people from other cultures and traditions was unusual.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,034 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».