China’s Longest Campaign: Birth Planning in the People’s Republic, 1949–2005
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
During the three decades that followed the founding of the People's Republic of China (PRC), many scholars explored the impact of high fertility on economic development.Nelson (1956) suggested there would be a low-level equilibrium trap for underdeveloped countries, namely a stable equilibrium level of per capita income at or close to subsistence requirements; cycles of poverty could then result due to stagnation of per capita investment as population grew rapidly, even though the capital stock accumulated.Coale and Hoover (1958) pointed out that extra births under high fertility would engulf the total product.A period of two to three decades of reduced fertility would result in fewer dependents and less of the total product assigned to consumers, and thus a higher average economic level.This was treated as a classic theory and a solid foundation for controlling birth control.In order to prevent per capita GNP from declining, three percent of total GNP would have to be invested in fixed capital for each percentage point increase in population (United Nations 1971).Many studies were devoted to the negative correlation between high fertility and economic development.These studies generated interest in the need for a population policy and the optimal design of such a policy (Birdsall 1977).With the publication of The Population Bomb (Ehrlich 1968) and The Limits to Growth (Meadows et al. 1972), a sound population policy received even stronger advocacy.Even though China, the world's most populous nation, was estranged and cut off from the outside academic community, it experimented remarkably with its fertility.Tyrene White's 2006 book, China's Longest Campaign: Birth Planning in the People's Republic, 1949Republic, -2005, is a very ambitious effort to elucidate the vicissitudes of this experiment with birth planning after the founding of the PRC.Based on reliable documentary evidence and numerous interviews with Chinese citizens, grassroots cadres, and officials, White examines the course of the long campaign that was premised on the radical idea of engineering fertility and rationing children through the use of strict birth limits.She illuminates why and how China could undertake such an unpopular policy of transforming a voluntary birth control program into a mandatory program and, most importantly, describes how such a program could survive and be intensified.The 297-page book includes nine chapters, as well as references and indexes.In the introductory chapter, entitled "The Collectivization of Childbearing," White presents the focus of the book, namely, why the Deng Xiaoping regime chose population control and such a strict rationing method, as well as the means of enforcement, and the state's imperviousness to peasant resistance.The author explains her choice of the term "birth planning" rather than other possible terminology.The second chapter explores the origins of birth planning before 1960 under Mao's regime.In the mid-1950s, even though the anti-natalist policy was adopted, with Zhou Enlai and others instituting a program and plan, it was not strictly implemented without Mao's personal endorsement.Chapter 3 is devoted to the transition from loose birth control during the Great Leap Forward period and the Cultural Revolution under Mao's regime to the strict birth planning under Deng's regime.In chapter 4 the author presents a vivid picture of "Historical Studies on Mortality," special issue, Canadian Studies in Population 39, no.3-4 (2012): 142-144.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».